• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少大型综合医院环境影响行动的优先顺序达成共识:名义群体技术的应用。

Consensus on Prioritisation of Actions for Reducing the Environmental Impact of a Large Tertiary Hospital: Application of the Nominal Group Technique.

机构信息

Anaesthetics Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia.

Department of Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053978.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20053978
PMID:36901002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001469/
Abstract

Hospitals are the largest greenhouse gas producers within the Australian healthcare sector due to the large amounts of energy, resource utilization, equipment and pharmaceuticals required to deliver care. In order to reduce healthcare emissions, healthcare services must take multiple actions to address the broad range of emissions produced when delivering patient care. The goal of this study was to seek consensus on the priority actions needed to reduce the environmental impact of a tertiary Australian hospital. A nominal group technique was utilized within a multidisciplinary, executive-led environmental sustainability committee to find consensus on the 62 proposed actions to reduce the environmental impact of a tertiary Australian hospital. Thirteen participants joined an online workshop during which an educational presentation was delivered, 62 potential actions were privately ranked according to two domains of 'amenability to change' and 'scale of climate impact' and a moderated group discussion ensued. The group achieved verbal consensus on 16 actions that span staff education, procurement, pharmaceuticals, waste, transport and advocacy on all-electric capital works upgrades. In addition, the individual ratings of potential actions according to each domain were ranked and shared with the group. Despite a large number of actions and varied perspectives within the group, the nominal group technique can be used to focus a hospital leadership group on priority actions to improve environmental sustainability.

摘要

由于提供医疗服务需要大量的能源、资源利用、设备和药品,医院是澳大利亚医疗保健部门中最大的温室气体排放者。为了减少医疗保健排放,医疗服务必须采取多种行动,解决在提供患者护理时产生的广泛排放。本研究的目的是就减少一家澳大利亚三级医院环境影响所需的优先行动寻求共识。在一个多学科、执行领导的环境可持续性委员会中,使用名义小组技术来就减少一家澳大利亚三级医院环境影响的 62 项拟议行动达成共识。13 名参与者参加了一个在线研讨会,会上进行了一次教育演讲,根据“可改变性”和“气候影响规模”这两个领域对 62 项潜在行动进行了私下排名,并随后进行了小组讨论。该小组就跨越员工教育、采购、药品、废物、运输和倡导全电动资本工程升级的 16 项行动达成了口头共识。此外,根据每个领域对潜在行动的个人评级进行了排名,并与小组分享。尽管小组内有大量的行动和不同的观点,但名义小组技术可用于集中医院领导层的注意力,以优先采取行动来提高环境可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6e1/10001469/6f1fde4ddb9b/ijerph-20-03978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6e1/10001469/6f1fde4ddb9b/ijerph-20-03978-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6e1/10001469/6f1fde4ddb9b/ijerph-20-03978-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Consensus on Prioritisation of Actions for Reducing the Environmental Impact of a Large Tertiary Hospital: Application of the Nominal Group Technique.减少大型综合医院环境影响行动的优先顺序达成共识:名义群体技术的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053978.
2
What can we learn from Australian general practices taking steps to be more environmentally sustainable? A qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医学采取措施提高环境可持续性,我们能从中得到什么启示?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2023 May 31;40(3):465-472. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad027.
3
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders.确定糖尿病研究的目标行为优先级:运用名义群体技术达成关键利益相关者的共识。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 6;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9. eCollection 2016.
6
Action plan for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the hospital-based health care of the Hellenic Army.希臘軍隊基於醫院的醫療保健中緩解溫室氣體排放的行動計劃。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Feb 24;194(3):221. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-09871-3.
7
Victorian public healthcare Chief Executive Officers' views on renewable energy supply.维多利亚州公共医疗保健首席执行官对可再生能源供应的看法。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):7-11. doi: 10.1071/AH20248.
8
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on environmental sustainability.医疗保健专业人员对环境可持续性的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Jun;21(4):414-25. doi: 10.1177/0969733013502802. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
Environmental sustainability in intensive care: the path forward. An ESICM Green Paper.重症监护中的环境可持续性:前进之路。一份 ESICM 绿皮书。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1729-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07662-7. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
10
The financial and environmental impact of purchased anaesthetic agents in an Australian tertiary hospital.澳大利亚一家三级医院购买麻醉剂的财务和环境影响。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2023 Mar;51(2):141-148. doi: 10.1177/0310057X221129291. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Building climate resilience and mitigating the impact of climate change on cancer care: strategies and solutions for low and middle income countries.增强气候适应力并减轻气候变化对癌症护理的影响:低收入和中等收入国家的策略与解决方案
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02004-4.
2
Australian and Canadian clinicians' views and application of 'carbon health literacy': a qualitative study.澳大利亚和加拿大临床医生对“碳健康素养”的看法和应用:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):1457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11903-2.
3
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Mandatory Reporting of Emissions to Achieve Net-Zero Health Care.强制报告排放以实现医疗保健净零排放。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 29;387(26):2469-2476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2210022. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
2
Reaching Consensus on Politicized Topics: A Convening of Public Health Professionals to Discuss Appropriate Abortion Activities for US Health Departments.就政治化议题达成共识:召集公共卫生专业人员讨论美国卫生部门的适当堕胎活动。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(4):366-374. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001455. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future.
减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的策略和方法:系统评价。
BMJ. 2024 Oct 8;387:e081284. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081284.
柳叶刀倒计时报告 2021:健康与气候变化——为健康未来敲响红色警钟。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 30;398(10311):1619-1662. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Net zero healthcare: a call for clinician action.实现医疗保健净零排放:临床医生的行动呼吁。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 20;374:n1323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1323.
5
Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study.卫生专业人员对气候变化与健康的看法:一项多国调查研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 May;5(5):e316-e323. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00053-X. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England.医疗保健应对气候变化:英格兰国民保健制度的碳足迹评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.
7
Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage In The United States: An Update.美国的医疗保健污染与公共健康损害:最新进展
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Dec;39(12):2071-2079. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247.
8
Stakeholder Development of an Online Program to Track Arthritis-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes Longitudinally: Live Yes! INSIGHTS.用于纵向跟踪关节炎相关患者报告结局的在线项目的利益相关者开发:实时参与!深入见解。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Dec;2(12):750-759. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11203. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Risk ranking of chemical and microbiological hazards in food.食品中化学和微生物危害的风险分级
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 27;16(Suppl 1):e160813. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.e160813. eCollection 2018 Aug.
10
Moving Stroke Rehabilitation Research Evidence into Clinical Practice: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations From the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.将中风康复研究证据转化为临床实践:中风康复圆桌会议基于共识的核心建议。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Nov;33(11):935-942. doi: 10.1177/1545968319886485. Epub 2019 Oct 29.