Department of Management, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
IEDIS: Research Institute of Employment, Digital Society and Sustainability, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054510.
Perspectives of the core competencies of nurses are varied among postgraduate-year nurses, which makes it challenging to establish training programs and develop evaluation instruments. Particularly critical for nurses is the ongoing acquisition of competencies throughout life. Sometimes this acquisition is funded by the healthcare system, but the key question is how the system leverages this acquisition and ultimately how it translates into patient care. This study seeks to explore nurses' key competencies acquired through continuing education from the perspective of two groups of postgraduate nurses with different levels of experience and with different objectives to be assessed. An NGT procedure was applied to the group discussion. The participants were recruited according to basic factors such as the number of years of professional experience, their level of education, and their preferred professional status. Thus, seventeen professionals participated in the study, representing two public hospitals in the city. Following the NGT procedure, the competencies identified from the thematic analysis were scored and ranked to achieve a consensus. Eight core issues were derived in the novel group concerning transferring the competencies to patient care quality: holism, care work, organizational barriers, specialization, no transfer, confidence, knowledge, and instrumental tools. Four core issues were derived when asked about the relationship between the resources invested and the organizational and professional development of the nursing staff: professional development, positive learning, negative learning, and recognition. In the more experienced group, seven issues were derived from the first issue raised: continuous learning, quality, confidence, holism, safe care, autonomy, and technical issues. Additionally, six issues arose from the second question: satisfaction, autonomy, creativity, productivity, professional development, and recognition. In conclusion, the perceptions of the two selected groups are negative when it comes to assessing the extent to which the competencies acquired in lifelong learning are transferred to the patient and the system evaluates and recognizes these competencies for improvement.
护士的核心能力视角在不同年级的护士中有所不同,这使得建立培训计划和开发评估工具具有挑战性。对护士来说,特别重要的是在整个职业生涯中不断获得能力。有时这种获取是由医疗保健系统资助的,但关键问题是系统如何利用这种获取,以及最终如何将其转化为患者护理。本研究旨在从两组具有不同经验水平和不同评估目标的研究生护士的角度探讨护士通过继续教育获得的关键能力。应用 NGT 程序进行小组讨论。参与者是根据基本因素招募的,如专业经验年限、教育水平和他们喜欢的职业地位。因此,十七名专业人员参加了这项研究,代表了该市的两家公立医院。在 NGT 程序之后,从主题分析中确定的能力进行评分和排名以达成共识。在新的小组中,围绕将能力转移到患者护理质量的问题,得出了 8 个核心问题:整体性、护理工作、组织障碍、专业化、无法转移、信心、知识和工具。当问到投资资源与护理人员的组织和职业发展之间的关系时,衍生出 4 个核心问题:职业发展、积极学习、消极学习和认可。在经验更丰富的小组中,从提出的第一个问题中衍生出 7 个问题:持续学习、质量、信心、整体性、安全护理、自主权和技术问题。此外,从第二个问题中产生了 6 个问题:满意度、自主权、创造力、生产力、职业发展和认可。总之,两组选定的小组在评估终身学习中获得的能力在多大程度上转移到患者身上以及系统评估和认可这些能力以进行改进时的看法是负面的。