• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

易于阅读?审视发表于《自闭症研究》的外行摘要的可读性。

Easily readable? Examining the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research.

作者信息

Wen Ju, He Sike, Yi Lan

机构信息

School of Liberal Education, Chengdu Jincheng College, Sichuan, China.

West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2023 May;16(5):935-940. doi: 10.1002/aur.2917. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1002/aur.2917
PMID:36905091
Abstract

Communicating science to the general public could sometimes be problematic partly because the language used in scientific writing was difficult to understand for people outside the scientific community. Against this backdrop, lay summaries were introduced to the research community. Lay summaries are short, non-technical summaries of scientific articles that are aimed at a lay audience. Despite the increasing attention on the roles that lay summaries play in scientific communication, it remains unclear whether they are comprehensible to the lay audience. To address the foregoing concerns, this study examines the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research. It was found that lay summaries were more readable than traditional abstracts but were not easy enough to read for the lay audience. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.

摘要

向公众传播科学有时可能会出现问题,部分原因是科学写作中使用的语言对于科学界以外的人来说难以理解。在这种背景下,研究界引入了通俗摘要。通俗摘要是针对普通受众的科学文章的简短、非技术性总结。尽管通俗摘要在科学传播中所起的作用越来越受到关注,但它们是否能被普通受众理解仍不清楚。为了解决上述问题,本研究考察了发表在《自闭症研究》上的通俗摘要的可读性。研究发现,通俗摘要比传统摘要更具可读性,但对于普通受众来说阅读起来仍不够容易。文中讨论了这些发现的可能解释。

相似文献

1
Easily readable? Examining the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research.易于阅读?审视发表于《自闭症研究》的外行摘要的可读性。
Autism Res. 2023 May;16(5):935-940. doi: 10.1002/aur.2917. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Are plain language summaries more readable than scientific abstracts? Evidence from six biomedical and life sciences journals.通俗易懂的摘要比科学摘要更具可读性吗?来自六家生物医学和生命科学期刊的证据。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Jan;34(1):114-126. doi: 10.1177/09636625241252565. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Are lay abstracts published in readable enough for the general public? A short report.发表的非专业摘要对普通大众来说可读性够强吗?一篇简短报告。
Autism. 2023 Nov;27(8):2555-2559. doi: 10.1177/13623613231163083. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
"Is all the stuff about neurons necessary?" The development of lay summaries to disseminate findings from the Newcastle Cognitive Function after Stroke (COGFAST) study.“所有关于神经元的内容都有必要吗?” 中风后纽卡斯尔认知功能(COGFAST)研究结果传播的通俗总结的发展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 11;3:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0066-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.理解简明英语摘要。两种提高研究报告中简明英语摘要质量方法的比较。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Oct 9;3:17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0. eCollection 2017.
7
Optimizing Readability and Format of Plain Language Summaries for Medical Research Articles: Cross-sectional Survey Study.优化医学研究文章的平实语言摘要的可读性和格式:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e22122. doi: 10.2196/22122.
8
Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists.非专业摘要与总结:给科学家的写作建议。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):577-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0570-1.
9
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.干预性综述 Cochrane 通俗易懂摘要的结论一致性、语言特点和易读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7.
10
Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices.心理学领域的科学摘要和通俗易懂的摘要:基于可读性指数的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0231160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231160. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Are plain language summaries published in health journals written according to instructions and health literacy principles? A systematic environmental scan.卫生期刊中发表的通俗易懂的摘要是否按照说明和健康素养原则撰写?系统环境扫描。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464.
2
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.开发和传播医学研究信息的简明语言资源报告的实践和障碍:范围综述。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15.