• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发表的非专业摘要对普通大众来说可读性够强吗?一篇简短报告。

Are lay abstracts published in readable enough for the general public? A short report.

作者信息

Yi Lan, Yang Xiaohu

机构信息

Zhejiang University, China.

Chongqing University, China.

出版信息

Autism. 2023 Nov;27(8):2555-2559. doi: 10.1177/13623613231163083. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1177/13623613231163083
PMID:36964701
Abstract

Research papers are sometimes hard to follow. Lay abstracts give a short account of research papers. However, it is unclear whether lay abstracts are readable to the lay people. This study examined the readability of 570 abstracts and lay abstracts published between 2020 and 2022 in the journal . We found that that lay abstracts are easier to read than abstracts but are harder to read than news reports. The findings suggest that lay abstracts, on average, are hard to read for the lay people. We propose that the journal and its authors may invite reviewers from outside the research community to test whether a lay abstract is readable.

摘要

研究论文有时很难理解。非专业摘要对研究论文进行了简短的描述。然而,非专业摘要对于普通大众来说是否易于阅读尚不清楚。本研究调查了2020年至2022年在该期刊上发表的570篇摘要和非专业摘要的可读性。我们发现,非专业摘要比摘要更容易阅读,但比新闻报道更难阅读。研究结果表明,一般来说,非专业摘要对于普通大众而言难以读懂。我们建议该期刊及其作者可以邀请研究领域之外的审稿人来测试一篇非专业摘要是否易于阅读。

相似文献

1
Are lay abstracts published in readable enough for the general public? A short report.发表的非专业摘要对普通大众来说可读性够强吗?一篇简短报告。
Autism. 2023 Nov;27(8):2555-2559. doi: 10.1177/13623613231163083. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
2
Easily readable? Examining the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research.易于阅读?审视发表于《自闭症研究》的外行摘要的可读性。
Autism Res. 2023 May;16(5):935-940. doi: 10.1002/aur.2917. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
3
Are plain language summaries more readable than scientific abstracts? Evidence from six biomedical and life sciences journals.通俗易懂的摘要比科学摘要更具可读性吗?来自六家生物医学和生命科学期刊的证据。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Jan;34(1):114-126. doi: 10.1177/09636625241252565. Epub 2024 May 24.
4
Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.理解简明英语摘要。两种提高研究报告中简明英语摘要质量方法的比较。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Oct 9;3:17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0. eCollection 2017.
5
Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.采用通用可读性公式评估100篇被引次数最多的神经影像学论文的可读性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 14;12:308. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00308. eCollection 2018.
6
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Comparison of the readability of lay summaries and scientific abstracts published in CF Research News and the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis: Recommendations for writing lay summaries.《囊性纤维化研究新闻》和《囊性纤维化杂志》上发表的通俗易懂的总结与科学摘要的可读性比较:撰写通俗易懂的总结的建议
J Cyst Fibros. 2022 Jan;21(1):e11-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.干预性综述 Cochrane 通俗易懂摘要的结论一致性、语言特点和易读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7.
9
Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists.非专业摘要与总结:给科学家的写作建议。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):577-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0570-1.
10
Clinical Patient Summaries Not Fit for Purpose: A Study in Urology.临床患者总结不适用:泌尿科研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1068-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Are plain language summaries published in health journals written according to instructions and health literacy principles? A systematic environmental scan.卫生期刊中发表的通俗易懂的摘要是否按照说明和健康素养原则撰写?系统环境扫描。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464.
2
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.开发和传播医学研究信息的简明语言资源报告的实践和障碍:范围综述。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
3
Improving accessibility of scientific research by artificial intelligence-An example for lay abstract generation.
通过人工智能提高科研的可及性——以生成非专业摘要为例。
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 29;9:20552076231186245. doi: 10.1177/20552076231186245. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.