Ciccarese Chiara, Strusi Alessandro, Arduini Daniela, Russo Pierluigi, Palermo Giuseppe, Foschi Nazario, Racioppi Marco, Tortora Giampaolo, Iacovelli Roberto
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Apr;115:102528. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102528. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
Standard treatment for localized non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is radical or partial nephrectomy. However, after radical surgery, patients with stage II-III have a substantial risk of relapse (around 35%). To date a unique standardized classification for the risk of disease recurrence still lack. Moreover, in the last years great attention has been focused in developing systemic therapies with the aim of improving the disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk patients, with negative results from adjuvant VEGFR-TKIs. Therefore, there is still a need for developing effective treatments for radically resected RCC patients who are at intermediate/high risk of relapse. Recently, interesting results came from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, with a significant benefit in terms of disease-free survival from adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the conflicting results of diverse clinical trials investigating different ICI-based regimens in the adjuvant setting, together with the still immature data on the overall survival advantage of immunotherapy, requires careful considerations. Furthermore, several questions remain unanswered, primarily regarding the selection of patients who could benefit the most from immunotherapy. In this review, we have summarized the main clinical trials investigating adjuvant therapy in RCC, with a particular focus on immunotherapy. Moreover, we have analyzed the crucial issue of patients' stratification according to the risk of disease recurrence, and we have described the possible future prospective and novel agents under evaluation for perioperative and adjuvant therapies.
局限性非转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)的标准治疗方法是根治性或部分肾切除术。然而,根治性手术后,II-III期患者有相当大的复发风险(约35%)。迄今为止,仍缺乏针对疾病复发风险的独特标准化分类。此外,近年来,人们高度关注开发全身治疗方法,旨在提高高危患者的无病生存期(DFS),但辅助性血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKIs)的结果并不理想。因此,对于根治性切除后处于中/高复发风险的RCC患者,仍需要开发有效的治疗方法。最近,针对PD-1/PD-L1通路的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)取得了有趣的结果,辅助性帕博利珠单抗在无病生存期方面有显著益处。然而,在辅助治疗环境中,不同的基于ICI方案的各种临床试验结果相互矛盾,加上免疫治疗在总生存优势方面的数据仍不成熟,需要仔细考虑。此外,仍有几个问题未得到解答,主要涉及如何选择最能从免疫治疗中获益的患者。在这篇综述中,我们总结了研究RCC辅助治疗的主要临床试验,特别关注免疫治疗。此外,我们分析了根据疾病复发风险对患者进行分层的关键问题,并描述了围手术期和辅助治疗中正在评估的可能的未来前景和新型药物。