Soy Nutrition Institute Global, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelp, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):392-405. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
The health and environmental advantages of plant-predominant diets will likely lead to increasing numbers of consumers reducing their reliance on animal products. Consequently, health organizations and professionals will need to provide guidance on how best to make this change. In many developed countries, nearly twice as much protein is derived from animal versus plant sources. Potential benefits could result from consuming a higher share of plant protein. Advice to consume equal amounts from each source is more likely to be embraced than advice to eschew all or most animal products. However, much of the plant protein currently consumed comes from refined grains, which is unlikely to provide the benefits associated with plant-predominant diets. In contrast, legumes provide ample amounts of protein as well other components such as fiber, resistant starch, and polyphenolics, which are collectively thought to exert health benefits. But despite their many accolades and endorsement by the nutrition community, legumes make a negligible contribution to global protein intake, especially in developed countries. Furthermore, evidence suggests the consumption of cooked legumes will not substantially increase over the next several decades. We argue here that plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) made from legumes are a viable alternative, or a complement, to consuming legumes in the traditional manner. These products may be accepted by meat eaters because they can emulate the orosensory properties and functionality of the foods they are intended to replace. PBMAs can be both transition foods and maintenance foods in that they can facilitate the transition to a plant-predominant diet and make it easier to maintain. PBMAs also have a distinct advantage of being able to be fortified with shortfall nutrients in plant-predominant diets. Whether existing PBMAs provide similar health benefits as whole legumes, or can be formulated to do so, remains to be established.
植物性饮食在健康和环境方面的优势可能会促使越来越多的消费者减少对动物产品的依赖。因此,健康组织和专业人士需要提供指导,说明如何最好地实现这一转变。在许多发达国家,人们从动物来源获取的蛋白质几乎是从植物来源获取的两倍。从食用更高比例的植物蛋白中可能会获得潜在的益处。建议从每种来源摄入等量的蛋白质,比建议避免食用所有或大部分动物产品更有可能被接受。然而,目前人们消费的大部分植物蛋白来自精制谷物,这不太可能提供与植物性饮食相关的益处。相比之下,豆类提供了大量的蛋白质以及其他成分,如纤维、抗性淀粉和多酚,这些成分被认为具有健康益处。但尽管豆类受到营养界的广泛赞誉和认可,但它们对全球蛋白质摄入量的贡献微不足道,尤其是在发达国家。此外,有证据表明,在未来几十年,煮熟的豆类的消费不太可能大幅增加。我们在这里认为,由豆类制成的植物性肉类替代品 (PBMAs) 是一种可行的选择,或者是传统食用豆类的补充。这些产品可能会被肉食者接受,因为它们可以模仿它们所替代的食物的口感和功能。PBMAs 既可以作为过渡食品,也可以作为维持食品,因为它们可以促进向植物性饮食的过渡,并使维持饮食更加容易。PBMAs 还有一个明显的优势,即可以添加植物性饮食中缺乏的营养物质。现有的 PBMAs 是否提供与整颗豆类相同的健康益处,或者是否可以通过配方来实现,还有待确定。