Olguin Jonadab E, Mendoza-Rodriguez Monica G, Sanchez-Barrera C Angel, Terrazas Luis I
Laboratorio Nacional en Salud, Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla 54090, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
Unidad de Biomedicina, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalnepantla 54090, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):251-267. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i2.251.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent and deadly neoplasms worldwide. According to GLOBOCAN predictions, its incidence will increase from 1.15 million CRC cases in 2020 to 1.92 million cases in 2040. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in CRC development is necessary to improve strategies focused on reducing the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of this oncological pathology. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are the main strategies for treating CRC. The conventional chemotherapeutic agent utilized throughout the last four decades is 5-fluorouracil, notwithstanding its low efficiency as a single therapy. In contrast, combining 5-fluorouracil therapy with leucovorin and oxaliplatin or irinotecan increases its efficiency. However, these treatments have limited and temporary solutions and aggressive side effects. Additionally, most patients treated with these regimens develop drug resistance, which leads to disease progression. The immune response is considered a hallmark of cancer; thus, the use of new strategies and methodologies involving immune molecules, cells, and transcription factors has been suggested for CRC patients diagnosed in stages III and IV. Despite the critical advances in immunotherapy, the development and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on CRC is still under investigation because less than 25% of CRC patients display an increased 5-year survival. The causes of CRC are diverse and include modifiable environmental factors (smoking, diet, obesity, and alcoholism), individual genetic mutations, and inflammation-associated bowel diseases. Due to these diverse causes, the solutions likely cannot be generalized. Interestingly, new strategies, such as single-cell multiomics, proteomics, genomics, flow cytometry, and massive sequencing for tumor microenvironment analysis, are beginning to clarify the way forward. Thus, the individual mechanisms involved in developing the CRC microenvironment, their causes, and their consequences need to be understood from a genetic and immunological perspective. This review highlighted the importance of altering the immune response in CRC. It focused on drugs that may modulate the immune response and show specific efficacy and contrasted with evidence that immunosuppression or the promotion of the immune response is the answer to generating effective treatments with combined chemotherapeutic drugs.
结直肠癌(CRC)是全球最常见且致命的肿瘤之一。根据全球癌症负担(GLOBOCAN)的预测,其发病率将从2020年的115万例结直肠癌病例增加到2040年的192万例。因此,有必要更好地了解结直肠癌发生发展所涉及的机制,以改进旨在降低这种肿瘤性疾病发病率、患病率和死亡率的策略。手术、化疗和放疗是治疗结直肠癌的主要策略。在过去四十年中一直使用的传统化疗药物是5-氟尿嘧啶,尽管其作为单一疗法效率较低。相比之下,将5-氟尿嘧啶疗法与亚叶酸、奥沙利铂或伊立替康联合使用可提高其疗效。然而,这些治疗方法的解决方案有限且具有临时性,并且副作用较大。此外,大多数接受这些治疗方案的患者会产生耐药性,从而导致疾病进展。免疫反应被认为是癌症的一个标志;因此,对于诊断为III期和IV期的结直肠癌患者,有人建议采用涉及免疫分子、细胞和转录因子的新策略和方法。尽管免疫疗法取得了重大进展,但免疫检查点抑制剂对结直肠癌的发展和影响仍在研究中,因为不到25%的结直肠癌患者5年生存率有所提高。结直肠癌的病因多种多样,包括可改变的环境因素(吸烟、饮食、肥胖和酗酒)、个体基因突变以及炎症相关的肠道疾病。由于这些病因各不相同,解决方案可能无法一概而论。有趣的是,诸如单细胞多组学、蛋白质组学、基因组学、流式细胞术以及用于肿瘤微环境分析的大规模测序等新策略,正开始为未来指明方向。因此,需要从遗传学和免疫学角度了解结直肠癌微环境形成所涉及的个体机制、其成因及其后果。这篇综述强调了改变结直肠癌免疫反应的重要性。它重点关注了可能调节免疫反应并显示出特定疗效的药物,并与免疫抑制或促进免疫反应是联合化疗药物产生有效治疗方法的答案这一证据形成对比。