Meregildo-Rodriguez Edinson Dante, Asmat-Rubio Martha Genara, Vásquez-Tirado Gustavo Adolfo
Universidad César Vallejo, Escuela de Medicina, Trujillo, Peru.
Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Escuela de Medicina, Trujillo, Peru.
Infez Med. 2023 Mar 1;31(1):93-102. doi: 10.53854/liim-3101-13. eCollection 2022.
Tetanus is a potentially lethal infection and remains a priority public health problem in countries with low vaccination coverage. We aim to synthesize the evidence on the clinical-epidemiologic characteristics of oral (odontogenic) tetanus.
We report a case of oral tetanus. Furthermore, we collected eligible articles about oral tetanus published to date. We performed a systematic review with an exhaustive search of the literature published up to June 30, 2022, in Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect.
We analyzed 19 studies that enrolled 26 cases of oral tetanus. The mean age was 51.60 ± 21.95 (range 10-77) years. The frequency and lethality of odontogenic tetanus were higher in males than females. More than 60% of cases occurred in North America. Almost three-quarters of cases were associated with a dental procedure - mainly dental extraction - meanwhile, tooth decay accounted for 23% of cases. The median incubation period was 8.0 (IQR 10.0) days. The time between trismus and death was 4.25±1.89 (range 3-7) days. was isolated in only 11.54% of cases. Administration of anti-tetanus immunoglobulin alone or combined with anti-tetanus toxoid was reported in at least 42% of cases, and antibiotics in 32% of cases. Patients required tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation in 12% and 8% of cases, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 18.38±14.97 (range 4-53) days. The lethality of odontogenic tetanus was (30.77%).
Since the diagnosis of tetanus is merely clinical, it is crucial to have a high index of suspicion to diagnose this disease correctly. Although odontogenic tetanus is rare, it is potentially life-threatening.
破伤风是一种潜在的致命感染,在疫苗接种覆盖率低的国家仍然是一个优先的公共卫生问题。我们旨在综合关于口腔(牙源性)破伤风临床流行病学特征的证据。
我们报告一例口腔破伤风病例。此外,我们收集了迄今为止发表的关于口腔破伤风的符合条件的文章。我们进行了一项系统综述,全面检索了截至2022年6月30日在Medline(PubMed)、谷歌学术、Scopus、EMBASE、科学网和ScienceDirect上发表的文献。
我们分析了19项纳入26例口腔破伤风病例的研究。平均年龄为51.60±21.95(范围10 - 77)岁。牙源性破伤风的发病率和致死率男性高于女性。超过60%的病例发生在北美。近四分之三的病例与牙科手术有关——主要是拔牙——同时,龋齿占病例的23%。中位潜伏期为8.0(四分位间距10.0)天。牙关紧闭至死亡的时间为4.25±1.89(范围3 - 7)天。仅在11.54%的病例中分离出[病原体名称未给出]。至少42%的病例报告单独使用抗破伤风免疫球蛋白或与破伤风类毒素联合使用,32%的病例使用抗生素。分别有12%和8%的病例需要气管切开术和机械通气。平均住院时间为18.38±14.97(范围4 - 53)天。牙源性破伤风的致死率为(30.77%)。
由于破伤风的诊断仅基于临床,因此保持高度的怀疑指数对于正确诊断这种疾病至关重要。尽管牙源性破伤风罕见,但它可能危及生命。