• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方案：按组成部分探究个案管理在无家可归问题中的效果：有效性与实施的系统评价，并进行荟萃分析和主题综合。

PROTOCOL: Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta-analysis and thematic synthesis.

作者信息

Weightman Alison L, Kelson Mark J, Thomas Ian, Mann Mala K, Searchfield Lydia, Hannigan Ben, Smith Robin J, Willis Simone, Cordiner Rhiannon

机构信息

Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE) Cardiff University Cardiff UK.

Alan Turing Institute, School of Mathematics University of Exeter UK.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 23;18(1):e1220. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1220. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/cl2.1220
PMID:36908653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8866910/
Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The objectives are as follows: To carry out a mixed methods review to summarise current evidence relating to the components of case-management interventions for people experiencing homelessness.

摘要

这是一项坎贝尔综述的方案。目标如下：开展一项混合方法综述，以总结与针对无家可归者的个案管理干预措施组成部分相关的现有证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c1/8866910/cc11cdf00938/CL2-18-e1220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c1/8866910/2ef36f424a59/CL2-18-e1220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c1/8866910/cc11cdf00938/CL2-18-e1220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c1/8866910/2ef36f424a59/CL2-18-e1220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71c1/8866910/cc11cdf00938/CL2-18-e1220-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
PROTOCOL: Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta-analysis and thematic synthesis.方案：按组成部分探究个案管理在无家可归问题中的效果：有效性与实施的系统评价，并进行荟萃分析和主题综合。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 23;18(1):e1220. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1220. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减少无家可归现象干预措施的有效性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-281. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.3. eCollection 2018.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响：一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The effectiveness of abstinence-based and harm reduction-based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.高收入国家中针对无家可归成年人减少问题性物质使用的基于禁欲和减少伤害干预措施的有效性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析：一项系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 21;20(2):e1396. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1396. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
PROTOCOL: The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing problematic substance use, improving mental health, and improving housing stability for adults experiencing homelessness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.方案：心理社会干预对减少有问题的物质使用、改善心理健康以及提高无家可归成年人住房稳定性的有效性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 25;18(4):e1290. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1290. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Interventions to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 for people experiencing homelessness and their effectiveness: a systematic review.干预措施以减轻无家可归者及其有效性的 COVID-19 风险：系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1286730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1286730. eCollection 2023.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
PROTOCOL: The effectiveness of skills training to increase employment among those experiencing and at risk of homelessness: A systematic review.方案：技能培训对增加无家可归者及面临无家可归风险者就业机会的有效性：一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 9;19(4):e1372. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1372. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Investigating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Oral Health and Related Health Behaviour Interventions in Adults with Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.调查严重和多重弱势成年人的口腔健康和相关健康行为干预措施的有效性和可接受性：一项混合方法系统评价的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111554.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the effect of case management in homelessness per components: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation, with meta-analysis and thematic synthesis.按组成部分探究个案管理在解决无家可归问题中的效果：一项关于有效性与实施情况的系统评价，并进行荟萃分析和主题综合分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 May 17;19(2):e1329. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1329. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Engaging stakeholders to inform national implementation of critical time intervention in a program serving homeless-experienced Veterans.让利益相关者参与进来，为一项服务有过无家可归经历退伍军人的项目中的关键时间干预措施的国家实施提供信息。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;13:1009467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009467. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
PROTOCOL: Studies of the effectiveness of interventions to improve the welfare of those affected by, and at risk of, homelessness in high-income countries: An evidence and gap map.方案：高收入国家中改善受无家可归影响者及面临无家可归风险者福祉的干预措施有效性研究：证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 23;16(1):e1069. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1069. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of interventions to reduce homelessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减少无家可归现象干预措施的有效性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-281. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.3. eCollection 2018.
3
The prevalence of mental disorders among homeless people in high-income countries: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
高收入国家无家可归人群中心理障碍的患病率：更新的系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 23;18(8):e1003750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003750. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of depressive symptoms, dysthymia and major depressive disorders among homeless people.无家可归者中抑郁症状、心境恶劣和重度抑郁症患病率的系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e040061. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040061.
5
Long-term effects of homelessness on mortality: a 15-year Australian cohort study.长期无家可归对死亡率的影响：一项长达 15 年的澳大利亚队列研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Dec;44(6):476-481. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13038. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Homelessness and police-recorded crime victimisation: a nationwide, register-based cohort study.无家可归与警方记录的犯罪受害：一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):e333-e341. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30075-X.
7
The effectiveness of case management interventions for the homeless, vulnerably housed and persons with lived experience: A systematic review.案例管理干预对无家可归者、脆弱住房者和有生活经验者的效果：系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0230896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230896. eCollection 2020.
8
How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.如何使用 R 进行荟萃分析：实用教程。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
9
Making sense of street chaos: an ethnographic exploration of homeless people's health service utilization.理解街头乱象：对无家可归者健康服务利用的民族志探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1002-6.
10
Five-year standardised mortality ratios in a cohort of homeless people in Dublin.都柏林无家可归人群队列的 5 年标准化死亡率。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e023010. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023010.