• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多基因分析显示,使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ9)和复合性国际诊断交谈检查表简版(CIDI-SF)收集的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)症状之间存在重要差异。

Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF.

作者信息

Huang Lianyun, Tang Sonja, Rietkerk Jolien, Appadurai Vivek, Krebs Morten Dybdahl, Schork Andrew J, Werge Thomas, Zuber Verena, Kendler Kenneth, Cai Na

机构信息

Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Mar 1:2023.02.27.23286527. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.27.23286527.

DOI:10.1101/2023.02.27.23286527
PMID:36909638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10002792/
Abstract

Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are commonly assessed using self-rating instruments like the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9, for current symptoms), and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF, for lifetime worst-episode symptoms). Using data from the UKBiobank, we show that corresponding symptoms endorsed through PHQ9 and CIDI-SF have low to moderate genetic correlations (rG=0.43-0.87), and this cannot be fully attributed to different severity thresholds or the use of a skip-structure in CIDI-SF. Through a combination of Mendelian Randomization (MR) and polygenic prediction analyses, we find that PHQ9 symptoms are more associated with traits which reflect general dysphoria, while the skip-structure in CIDI-SF allows for the identification of heterogeneity among likely MDD cases. This has important implications on factor analyses performed on their respective genetic covariance matrices for the purpose of identification of genetic factors behind MDD symptom dimensions and heterogeneity.

摘要

重度抑郁症(MDD)的症状通常使用自评工具进行评估,如患者健康问卷9(PHQ9,用于评估当前症状)和综合国际诊断访谈简表(CIDI-SF,用于评估终生最严重发作症状)。利用英国生物银行的数据,我们发现通过PHQ9和CIDI-SF认可的相应症状具有低到中等的遗传相关性(rG = 0.43 - 0.87),这不能完全归因于不同的严重程度阈值或CIDI-SF中使用的跳过结构。通过孟德尔随机化(MR)和多基因预测分析相结合,我们发现PHQ9症状与反映一般烦躁情绪的特征更相关,而CIDI-SF中的跳过结构允许识别可能的MDD病例中的异质性。这对于在各自的遗传协方差矩阵上进行因子分析以识别MDD症状维度和异质性背后的遗传因素具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/01e7db4a311a/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/5ff4225043c1/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/459227db3ba7/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/5f45e74340f7/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/ebd210ac927d/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/8b6600710fc0/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/01e7db4a311a/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/5ff4225043c1/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/459227db3ba7/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/5f45e74340f7/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/ebd210ac927d/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/8b6600710fc0/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f7c/10002792/01e7db4a311a/nihpp-2023.02.27.23286527v1-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Polygenic analyses show important differences between MDD symptoms collected using PHQ9 and CIDI-SF.多基因分析显示,使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ9)和复合性国际诊断交谈检查表简版(CIDI-SF)收集的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)症状之间存在重要差异。
medRxiv. 2023 Mar 1:2023.02.27.23286527. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.27.23286527.
2
Polygenic Analyses Show Important Differences Between Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms Measured Using Various Instruments.多基因分析表明,使用不同工具测量的主要抑郁症状之间存在重要差异。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 15;95(12):1110-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Sensitivity and Specificity in Three Measures of Depression Among Mexican American Women.墨西哥裔美国女性抑郁的三种测量方法中的敏感性和特异性
J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Jun;19(3):562-571. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0512-1.
4
Major depressive episode among young adults: CIDI-SF versus SCAN consensus diagnoses.青年成年人中的重度抑郁发作:复合性国际诊断交谈检查表简易版(CIDI-SF)与神经精神疾病临床评定表(SCAN)一致性诊断比较
Psychol Med. 2002 Oct;32(7):1309-14. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702005810.
5
Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV-TR major depressive disorder, self-reported diagnosed depression and current depressive symptoms among adults in Germany.德国成年人中 DSM-IV-TR 重性抑郁障碍、自我报告确诊的抑郁症和当前抑郁症状的流行率及其相关因素。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
6
Diagnostic validity of the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI) depression module in an East African population.复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)抑郁模块在东非人群中的诊断有效性。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013;46(4):387-405. doi: 10.2190/PM.46.4.e.
7
Validation of case definitions of depression derived from administrative data against the CIDI-SF as reference standard: results from the PROspective Québec (PROQ) study.基于 CIDI-SF 作为参考标准验证来自行政数据的抑郁病例定义的有效性:来自前瞻性魁北克 (PROQ) 研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03501-x.
8
The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R).重度抑郁症的流行病学:全国共病调查复制研究(NCS-R)结果
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.
9
The Delta Study - Prevalence and characteristics of mood disorders in 924 individuals with low mood: Results of the of the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).德尔塔研究——924名情绪低落个体中情绪障碍的患病率及特征:世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)结果
Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;11(6):e02167. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2167. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Current major depressive syndrome measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): results from a cross-sectional population-based study of adults in Germany.使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)测量的当前重度抑郁综合征:来自德国一项基于人群的成年人横断面研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 10;15:77. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0463-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.重新审视抑郁症测量的理论和方法基础。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Jun;1(6):358-368. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00050-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
Phenotype integration improves power and preserves specificity in biobank-based genetic studies of major depressive disorder.表型整合提高了基于生物库的重度抑郁症遗传研究的功效并保持了特异性。
Nat Genet. 2023 Dec;55(12):2082-2093. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01559-9. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
The structure of the symptoms of major depression: Factor analysis of a lifetime worst episode of depressive symptoms in a large general population sample.
重性抑郁障碍症状结构:大样本一般人群一生中最重抑郁发作时症状的因子分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 15;307:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.064. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Not sad enough for a depression trial? A systematic review of depression measures and cut points in clinical trial registrations.抑郁试验中不够悲伤?临床试验登记中抑郁测量和切点的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
Symptom-level modelling unravels the shared genetic architecture of anxiety and depression.症状水平建模揭示了焦虑和抑郁的共同遗传结构。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1432-1442. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01094-9. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Editorial Perspective: Prescribing measures: unintended negative consequences of mandating standardized mental health measurement.编辑视角:处方措施:强制进行标准化心理健康测量的意外负面后果。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;62(8):1032-1036. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13333. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023.孟德尔随机化研究实施指南:2023年夏季更新版
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Aug 4;4:186. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3. eCollection 2019.
8
Minimal phenotyping yields genome-wide association signals of low specificity for major depression.最小表型分析产生的广泛性抑郁症全基因组关联信号特异性低。
Nat Genet. 2020 Apr;52(4):437-447. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0594-5. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
9
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis.患者健康问卷-9 评分不能准确估计抑郁症患病率:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:115-128.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
10
Mental health in UK Biobank - development, implementation and results from an online questionnaire completed by 157 366 participants: a reanalysis.英国生物银行中的心理健康——157366名参与者完成的在线调查问卷的开发、实施及结果:一项重新分析
BJPsych Open. 2020 Feb 6;6(2):e18. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.100.