DiCarlo Julie A, Erler Kimberly S, Petrilli Marina, Emerson Kristi, Gochyyev Perman, Schwamm Lee H, Lin David J
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Digit Health. 2023 Feb 23;5:1043806. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1043806. eCollection 2023.
Traditional methods for obtaining outcomes for patients after acute stroke are resource-intensive. This study aimed to examine the feasibility, reliability, cost, and acceptability of collecting outcomes after acute stroke with a short message service (SMS)-text messaging program.
Patients were enrolled in an SMS-text messaging program at acute stroke hospitalization discharge. Participants were prompted to complete assessments including the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement (PROM) Information System Global-10 at 30, 60, and 90 days postdischarge SMS-text. Agreement and cost of SMS-text data collection were compared to those obtained from traditional follow-up methods ( phone or in the clinic). Participant satisfaction was surveyed upon program conclusion.
Of the 350 patients who agreed to receive SMS texts, 40.5% responded to one or more assessments. Assessment responders were more likely to have English listed as their preferred language ( = 0.009), have a shorter length of hospital stay ( = 0.01), lower NIH stroke scale upon admission ( < 0.001), and be discharged home ( < 0.001) as compared to nonresponders. Weighted Cohen's kappa revealed that the agreement between SMS texting and traditional methods was almost perfect for dichotomized (good vs. poor) (= 0.8) and ordinal levels of the mRS score (= 0.8). Polychoric correlations revealed a significant association for PROM scores ( = 0.4, < 0.01 and = 0.4, < 0.01). A cost equation showed that gathering outcomes SMS texting would be less costly than phone follow-up for cohorts with more than 181 patients. Nearly all participants (91%) found the program acceptable and not burdensome (94%), and most (53%) felt it was helpful. Poststroke outcome data collection SMS texting is feasible, reliable, low-cost, and acceptable. Reliability was higher for functional outcomes as compared to PROMs.
While further validation is required, our findings suggest that SMS texting is a feasible method for gathering outcomes after stroke at scale to evaluate the efficacy of acute stroke treatments.
获取急性中风患者预后的传统方法资源消耗大。本研究旨在探讨通过短信程序收集急性中风后预后情况的可行性、可靠性、成本及可接受性。
患者在急性中风住院出院时加入短信程序。参与者被提示在出院后30、60和90天完成评估,包括改良Rankin量表(mRS)和患者报告结局测量(PROM)信息系统全球-10。将短信数据收集的一致性和成本与传统随访方法(电话或门诊)获得的结果进行比较。在项目结束时对参与者的满意度进行调查。
在350名同意接收短信的患者中,40.5%对一项或多项评估做出了回应。与未回应者相比,评估回应者更有可能将英语列为首选语言(P = 0.009),住院时间更短(P = 0.01),入院时NIH中风量表得分更低(P < 0.001),且出院回家(P < 0.001)。加权Cohen's kappa显示,短信与传统方法之间的一致性对于二分法(良好与不良)的mRS评分(κ = 0.8)和mRS评分的有序水平(κ = 0.8)几乎完美。多序相关显示PROM评分之间存在显著关联(r = 0.4,P < 0.01和r = 0.4,P < 0.01)。成本方程表明,对于超过181名患者的队列,通过短信收集预后情况的成本低于电话随访。几乎所有参与者(91%)认为该项目可接受且不繁重(94%),大多数(53%)觉得它有帮助。通过短信收集中风后结局数据是可行、可靠、低成本且可接受的。与PROMs相比,功能结局的可靠性更高。
虽然需要进一步验证,但我们的研究结果表明,短信是一种可行的大规模收集中风后预后情况的方法,以评估急性中风治疗效果。