• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区心理健康团队忠诚度量表:一种用于衡量针对严重精神疾病的社交网络干预项目忠诚度的工具。

The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness.

作者信息

Alvarez-Monjaras Mauricio, Lotmore Melissa, Razzaque Russell, Hopfenbeck Mark Steven, Pilling Stephen

机构信息

Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1076791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791
PMID:36910782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9992884/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Open dialogue (OD) is a multi-component therapeutic and organizational intervention for crisis and continuing community mental health care with a therapeutic focus on clients' social networks. The development and implementation of this model of care in the United Kingdom requires considerable contextual adaptations which need to be assessed to support effective implementation. Program fidelity-the extent to which core components of an intervention are delivered as intended by an intervention protocol at all levels-is crucial for these adaptations.

AIMS

To develop, pilot, and implement a program fidelity measure for community mental health services providing OD and 'treatment as usual' (TAU) or standard NHS crisis and community care.

METHODS

Measure structure, content, and scoring were developed and refined through an iterative process of discussion between the research team and OD experts. Measure was piloted in the 6 OD and 6 TAU services participating in a large-scale research program.

RESULTS

Initial data suggests that the Community Mental Health Team Fidelity Scale (COM-FIDE) is a potentially reliable and feasible measure of the fidelity of community mental health services and specific OD components of such services.

摘要

未标注

开放式对话(OD)是一种多成分的治疗性和组织性干预措施,用于危机干预及持续的社区精神卫生保健,其治疗重点关注服务对象的社会网络。在英国,这种护理模式的开发和实施需要进行大量的情境调整,而这些调整需要进行评估以支持有效实施。项目保真度——即干预的核心成分在各个层面上按照干预方案的预期进行实施的程度——对于这些调整至关重要。

目的

为提供开放式对话以及“常规治疗”(TAU)或标准国民保健服务危机及社区护理的社区精神卫生服务开发、试行并实施一项项目保真度测量工具。

方法

通过研究团队与开放式对话专家之间的反复讨论过程,对测量工具的结构、内容和评分进行了开发和完善。该测量工具在参与一项大规模研究项目的6个开放式对话服务机构和6个常规治疗服务机构中进行了试行。

结果

初步数据表明,社区精神卫生团队保真度量表(COM - FIDE)是一种潜在可靠且可行的测量社区精神卫生服务保真度以及此类服务特定开放式对话成分的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/c72080dd9931/fpsyg-14-1076791-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/09be7d506de6/fpsyg-14-1076791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/81a8ad5ab150/fpsyg-14-1076791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/bfa00760cc56/fpsyg-14-1076791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/c72080dd9931/fpsyg-14-1076791-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/09be7d506de6/fpsyg-14-1076791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/81a8ad5ab150/fpsyg-14-1076791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/bfa00760cc56/fpsyg-14-1076791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e859/9992884/c72080dd9931/fpsyg-14-1076791-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness.社区心理健康团队忠诚度量表:一种用于衡量针对严重精神疾病的社交网络干预项目忠诚度的工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1076791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791. eCollection 2023.
2
Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams.心理健康危机解决团队模型保真度测量方法的开发。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4.
3
Evaluating agency-led adaptions to an evidence-based lifestyle intervention for adults with serious mental illness.评估机构主导的针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人的循证生活方式干预措施的适应性。
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Aug 28;1:2633489520943200. doi: 10.1177/2633489520943200. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Development and refinement of the open dialog adherence protocol in complex mental health care.复杂精神卫生保健中开放式对话依从性协议的开发与完善
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1041375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041375. eCollection 2022.
5
Testing an implementation package in a housing skills training pilot for homeless-experienced persons with serious mental illness.在一项针对有严重精神疾病且有过无家可归经历者的住房技能培训试点中测试一个实施包。
Implement Res Pract. 2024 Mar 6;5:26334895241236679. doi: 10.1177/26334895241236679. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessing the link between implementation fidelity and health outcomes for a trial of intensive case management by community health workers: a mixed methods study protocol.评估社区卫生工作者强化病例管理试验中实施保真度与健康结果之间的联系:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2320-2.
7
Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper.开放对话、适应需求的心理健康护理和实施保真度:讨论文件。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816. doi: 10.1111/inm.12866. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway.基于证据的危机解决小组模式的忠实度:挪威一项跨中心的横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 4;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8.
9
Open Dialogue services around the world: a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services.世界各地的开放式对话服务:一项范围界定调查,探索精神卫生服务中实施开放式对话方法的组织特征。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1241936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936. eCollection 2023.
10
Implementation fidelity of a transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the STEPSTONES project.先天性心脏病青少年过渡项目的实施保真度:STEPSTONES 项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07549-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Open Dialogue services around the world: a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services.世界各地的开放式对话服务:一项范围界定调查,探索精神卫生服务中实施开放式对话方法的组织特征。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1241936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and refinement of the open dialog adherence protocol in complex mental health care.复杂精神卫生保健中开放式对话依从性协议的开发与完善
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1041375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041375. eCollection 2022.
2
Open Dialogue compared to treatment as usual for adults experiencing a mental health crisis: Protocol for the ODDESSI multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial.开放式对话与常规治疗对经历心理健康危机的成年人的比较:ODDESSI 多中心整群随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106664. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106664. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper.
开放对话、适应需求的心理健康护理和实施保真度:讨论文件。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816. doi: 10.1111/inm.12866. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
The family-oriented open dialogue approach in the treatment of first-episode psychosis: Nineteen-year outcomes.以家庭为导向的开放式对话治疗首发精神病:19 年结局。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.039. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams.心理健康危机解决团队模型保真度测量方法的开发。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4.
6
Implementation of the Crisis Resolution Team model in adult mental health settings: a systematic review.危机解决团队模式在成人心理健康环境中的实施:一项系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 8;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0441-x.
7
Open Dialogue and its Relevance to the NHS: Opinions of NHS Staff and Service Users.开放式对话及其与英国国家医疗服务体系的相关性:英国国家医疗服务体系工作人员和服务使用者的观点。
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Nov;51(8):931-8. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9849-5. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Practical Monitoring of Treatment Fidelity: Examples From a Team-Based Intervention for People With Early Psychosis.治疗保真度的实际监测:来自针对早期精神病患者的团队干预的实例
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):674-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400531. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
9
Inter-agency work in Open Dialogue: the significance of listening and authenticity.开放式对话中的跨部门合作:倾听与真实性的重要性。
J Interprof Care. 2014 Sep;28(5):433-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.901939. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness.一项针对严重精神疾病患者同伴支持的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 14;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-39.