• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放对话、适应需求的心理健康护理和实施保真度:讨论文件。

Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper.

机构信息

The Centre for Family-Based Mental Health Care, St. Vincent's Private Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816. doi: 10.1111/inm.12866. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1111/inm.12866
PMID:33848029
Abstract

Open Dialogue is a need-adapted approach to mental health care that was originally developed in Finland. Like other need-adapted approaches, Open Dialogue aims to meet consumer's needs and promote collaborative person-centred dialogue to support recovery. Need-adapted mental health care is distinguished by flexibility and responsiveness. Fidelity, defined from an implementation science perspective as the delivery of distinctive interventions in a high quality and effective fashion is a key consideration in health care. However, flexibility presents challenges for evaluating fidelity, which is much easier to evaluate when manualization and reproducible processes are possible. Hence, it remains unclear whether Open Dialogue and other need-adapted mental health interventions can be meaningfully evaluated for fidelity. The aim of this paper was to critically appraise and advance the evaluation of fidelity in need-adapted mental health care, using Open Dialogue as a case study. The paper opens a discussion about how fidelity should be evaluated in flexible, complex interventions, and identifies key questions that need to be asked by practitioners working in need-adapted mental health care to ensure they deliver these interventions as intended and in an evidence-based fashion.

摘要

开放对话是一种适应需求的心理健康护理方法,最初在芬兰开发。像其他适应需求的方法一样,开放对话旨在满足消费者的需求,并促进以合作为基础的以人为本的对话,以支持康复。适应需求的心理健康护理的特点是灵活性和响应性。从实施科学的角度来看,保真度被定义为以高质量和有效的方式提供独特的干预措施,这是医疗保健的一个关键考虑因素。然而,灵活性给保真度的评估带来了挑战,当手工和可重复的过程成为可能时,评估保真度就容易得多。因此,目前尚不清楚开放对话和其他适应需求的心理健康干预措施是否可以对其保真度进行有意义的评估。本文旨在以开放对话为例,批判性地评估和推进适应需求的心理健康护理中保真度的评估。本文讨论了如何在灵活、复杂的干预措施中评估保真度,并确定了在适应需求的心理健康护理中工作的从业者需要提出的关键问题,以确保他们按照预期并以循证的方式提供这些干预措施。

相似文献

1
Open Dialogue, need-adapted mental health care, and implementation fidelity: A discussion paper.开放对话、适应需求的心理健康护理和实施保真度:讨论文件。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):811-816. doi: 10.1111/inm.12866. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
'Should it fit? Yes. Does it fit? No': Exploring the organisational processes of introducing a recovery-oriented approach to mental health in Australian private health care.“是否合适?是。是否有效?否”:探索在澳大利亚私立医疗保健系统中引入以康复为导向的精神健康方法的组织流程。
Health (London). 2021 May;25(3):376-394. doi: 10.1177/1363459319889107. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Peer work in Open Dialogue: A discussion paper.同行评议在开放对话中的作用:讨论文件。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(5):1574-1583. doi: 10.1111/inm.12457. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
4
The association between Open Dialogue to young Danes in acute psychiatric crisis and their use of health care and social services: A retrospective register-based cohort study.丹麦急性精神危机青年开放对话与他们使用医疗保健和社会服务的关联:一项回顾性基于登记的队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Mar;91:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Implementing recovery-oriented interventions with staff in a psychiatric hospital: A mixed-methods study.在精神病医院对工作人员实施以康复为导向的干预措施:一项混合方法研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):569-581. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12502. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented.佛蒙特州的根茎植入:一项关于开放对话方法如何适应和实施的定性研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):681-693. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7.
7
[Open Dialogue and the Challenges for its Implementation - an analysis based on a review of the literature].[开放对话及其实施面临的挑战——基于文献综述的分析]
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Jan;24(1):229-246. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018241.32232016.
8
The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness.社区心理健康团队忠诚度量表:一种用于衡量针对严重精神疾病的社交网络干预项目忠诚度的工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1076791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791. eCollection 2023.
9
Towards a new (or rearticulated) philosophy of mental health nursing: A dialogue-on-dialogue.迈向心理健康护理的新(或重新阐述)哲学:一场关于对话的对话。
Nurs Philos. 2023 Mar 10:e12433. doi: 10.1111/nup.12433.
10
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.

引用本文的文献

1
Reputation and Responsibility: A Qualitative Investigation of Parents' Experiences of Open Dialogue School Meetings.声誉与责任:对家长参加公开对话式学校会议经历的定性调查
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Jul;51(3):e70030. doi: 10.1111/jmft.70030.
2
Power, position and social relations: Is the espoused absence of hierarchy in Open Dialogue naïve?权力、地位与社会关系:开放对话中所宣称的无等级制度是否天真?
Health (London). 2025 Mar;29(2):258-275. doi: 10.1177/13634593241249101. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Open Dialogue services around the world: a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services.
世界各地的开放式对话服务:一项范围界定调查,探索精神卫生服务中实施开放式对话方法的组织特征。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1241936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936. eCollection 2023.
4
Unraveling complexity in changing mental health care towards person-centered care.在向以患者为中心的护理转变的过程中揭示心理健康护理的复杂性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 14;14:1250856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1250856. eCollection 2023.
5
The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.人类学对开放对话研究的贡献:民族志研究方法与机遇
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1111588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111588. eCollection 2023.
6
The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness.社区心理健康团队忠诚度量表:一种用于衡量针对严重精神疾病的社交网络干预项目忠诚度的工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1076791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791. eCollection 2023.
7
Implementation of open dialogue in Germany: Efforts, challenges, and obstacles.德国开放式对话的实施:努力、挑战与障碍。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;13:1072719. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1072719. eCollection 2022.
8
Introducing Peer-supported Open Dialogue in changing mental health care.在不断变化的精神卫生保健中引入同伴支持的开放式对话。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1056071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056071. eCollection 2022.
9
"": How dialogical therapists understand and create reflective conversations in network meetings.“”:对话治疗师如何在网络会议中理解并创造反思性对话。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:992785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992785. eCollection 2022.
10
Organizational Change in Complex Systems: Organizational and Leadership Factors in the Introduction of Open Dialogue to Mental Health Care Services.复杂系统中的组织变革:在精神卫生保健服务中引入开放对话的组织和领导因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jan;59(1):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00984-0. Epub 2022 May 18.