Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Graduate School of Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0170622. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01706-22. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
Klebsiella oxytoca complex (C) species may overproduce their chromosomal class A OXY β-lactamases, conferring reduced susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam. Moreover, since clavulanate maintains its ability to inhibit these enzymes, the resulting resistance phenotype may falsely resemble the production of acquired extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). In this work, a collection of 44 C strains of human and animal origin was characterized with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and broth microdilution (BMD) susceptibility testing. Comparison of ESBL producers ( = 11; including CTX-M-15 [ = 6] and CTX-M-1 [ = 5] producers) and hyperproducers of OXYs ( = 21) showed certain phenotypic differences: piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC: 16 >64 μg/mL), cefotaxime (MIC: 64 4 μg/mL), ceftazidime (MIC: 32 4 μg/mL), cefepime (MIC: 8 4 μg/mL) and associated resistance to non-β-lactams (e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 90.9% 14.3%, respectively). However, a clear phenotype-based distinction between the two groups was difficult. Therefore, we evaluated 10 different inhibitor-based confirmatory tests to allow such categorization. All tests showed a sensitivity of 100%. However, only combination disk tests (CDTs) with cefepime/cefepime-clavulanate and ceftazidime/ceftazidime-clavulanate or the double-disk synergy test (DDST) showed high specificity (100%, 95.5%, and 100%, respectively). All confirmatory tests in BMD or using the MIC gradient strip did not perform well (specificity, ≤87.5%). Of note, ceftazidime/ceftazidime-avibactam tests also exhibited low specificity (CDT, 87.5%; MIC gradient strip, 77.8%). Our results indicate that standard antimicrobial susceptibility profiles can raise some suspicion, but only the use of cefepime/cefepime-clavulanate CDT or DDST can guarantee distinction between ESBL-producing C strains and those hyperproducing OXY enzymes.
产酸克雷伯菌复合体(C)种属可能会过度产生其染色体 A 类 OXY β-内酰胺酶,导致对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦、扩展谱头孢菌素和氨曲南的敏感性降低。此外,由于克拉维酸仍然能够抑制这些酶,因此产生的耐药表型可能类似于获得性扩展谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的产生。在这项工作中,对 44 株来自人和动物来源的 C 株进行了全基因组测序(WGS)和肉汤微量稀释(BMD)药敏试验。比较产 ESBL 菌( = 11;包括 CTX-M-15 [ = 6] 和 CTX-M-1 [ = 5] 产酶菌)和 OXY 高产量菌( = 21)显示出某些表型差异:哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(MIC:16 >64μg/mL)、头孢噻肟(MIC:64 4μg/mL)、头孢他啶(MIC:32 4μg/mL)、头孢吡肟(MIC:8 4μg/mL)和非β-内酰胺类药物耐药(例如,甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑:90.9% 14.3%)。然而,很难根据表型清楚地区分这两组。因此,我们评估了 10 种不同的基于抑制剂的确认试验来进行分类。所有测试的敏感性均为 100%。然而,只有头孢吡肟/头孢吡肟-克拉维酸和头孢他啶/头孢他啶-克拉维酸的组合纸片试验(CDTs)或双纸片协同试验(DDST)显示出高特异性(分别为 100%、95.5%和 100%)。BMD 或使用 MIC 梯度条的所有确认试验表现不佳(特异性,≤87.5%)。值得注意的是,头孢他啶/头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的测试也表现出较低的特异性(CDT,87.5%;MIC 梯度条,77.8%)。我们的结果表明,标准的抗菌药物敏感性谱可以引起一些怀疑,但只有使用头孢吡肟/头孢吡肟-克拉维酸 CDT 或 DDST 才能保证区分产 ESBL 的 C 株和过度产生 OXY 酶的 C 株。