Department of Psychology, University of Florida.
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.
Emotion. 2023 Dec;23(8):2370-2384. doi: 10.1037/emo0001118. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
Some public officials have expressed concern that policies mandating collective public health behaviors (e.g., national/regional "lockdown") may result in behavioral fatigue that ultimately renders such policies ineffective. Boredom, specifically, has been singled out as one potential risk factor for noncompliance. We examined whether there was empirical evidence to support this concern during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large cross-national sample of 63,336 community respondents from 116 countries. Although boredom was higher in countries with more COVID-19 cases and in countries that instituted more stringent lockdowns, such boredom did not predict longitudinal within-person decreases in social distancing behavior (or vice versa; = 8,031) in early spring and summer of 2020. Overall, we found little evidence that changes in boredom predict individual public health behaviors (handwashing, staying home, self-quarantining, and avoiding crowds) over time, or that such behaviors had any reliable longitudinal effects on boredom itself. In summary, contrary to concerns, we found little evidence that boredom posed a public health risk during lockdown and quarantine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
一些政府官员担心,强制实施集体公共卫生行为的政策(例如,全国/地区“封锁”)可能会导致行为疲劳,最终使这些政策失效。无聊感,特别是,已被单独挑出来作为不遵守规定的一个潜在风险因素。我们在一项来自 116 个国家的 63336 名社区受访者的大型跨国样本中,研究了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这种担忧是否有实证证据支持。尽管在 COVID-19 病例较多的国家和实施更严格封锁的国家,人们的无聊感更高,但这种无聊感并不能预测 2020 年春季和夏季个人社交距离行为的纵向下降(反之亦然;=8031)。总的来说,我们几乎没有证据表明无聊感的变化可以预测个人公共卫生行为(洗手、待在家里、自我隔离和避免人群)随时间的变化,或者这些行为对无聊本身有任何可靠的纵向影响。总之,与担忧相反,我们几乎没有证据表明无聊在封锁和隔离期间对公共健康构成威胁。