Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Unit Healthy Living, Sylviusweg 71, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 May 1;49(4):259-270. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4086. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of occupational exposures on the risk of a positive COVID-19 test, and whether this differed across pandemic waves.
Data from 207 034 workers from The Netherlands with test data on COVID-19 from June 2020 until August 2021 were available. Occupational exposure was estimated by using the eight dimensions of a COVID-19 job exposure matrix (JEM). Personal characteristics, household composition and residence area were derived from Statistics Netherlands. A test-negative design was applied in which the risk of a positive test was analyzed in a conditional logit model.
All eight dimensions of occupational exposure included in the JEM increased the odds of a positive test for the entire study period and three pandemic waves [OR ranging from 1.09, (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17) to 1.77 (95% CI 1.61-1.96)]. Adjusting for a previous positive test and other covariates strongly reduced the odds to be infected, but most dimensions remained at elevated risk. Fully adjusted models showed that contaminated work spaces and face covering were mostly relevant in the first two pandemic waves, whereas income insecurity showed higher odds in the third wave. Several occupations have a higher predicted value for a positive COVID-19 test, with variation over time. Discussion Occupational exposures are associated with a higher risk of a positive test, but variations over time exist in occupations with the highest risks. These findings provide insights for interventions among workers for future pandemic waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory epidemics.
本研究旨在探讨职业暴露对 COVID-19 检测阳性风险的影响,以及这种影响在不同大流行波次中是否存在差异。
本研究使用 COVID-19 职业暴露矩阵(JEM)的八个维度来估计职业暴露,该研究数据来自于 207034 名荷兰工人,这些工人在 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 8 月期间进行了 COVID-19 检测。个人特征、家庭构成和居住区域均来自荷兰统计局。本研究采用了病例对照设计,在条件逻辑回归模型中分析了阳性检测的风险。
JEM 中包含的职业暴露的所有八个维度均增加了整个研究期间和三个大流行波次的阳性检测几率[比值比(OR)范围为 1.09(95%置信区间(CI)1.02-1.17)至 1.77(95% CI 1.61-1.96)]。调整先前的阳性检测和其他协变量后,感染的几率大大降低,但大多数维度仍处于高风险。完全调整后的模型表明,在头两个大流行波次中,受污染的工作空间和面部遮盖物与较高的感染几率最为相关,而在第三个波次中,收入不稳定则显示出更高的感染几率。某些职业的 COVID-19 检测阳性预测值较高,且随时间变化而变化。讨论:职业暴露与较高的阳性检测风险相关,但在风险最高的职业中,随着时间的推移存在差异。这些发现为未来 COVID-19 或其他呼吸道传染病大流行波次中工人干预措施提供了依据。