Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.
作者信息
Martie van Tongeren Martie van Tongeren, Rhodes Sarah, Pearce Neil
机构信息
School of Health Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
出版信息
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):586-587. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4052. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.德国第一波疫情期间工作人员的职业与感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的风险：偏差可能性
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):586-587. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4052. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany.职业与德国首次大流行期间 108960 名工人的 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(6):446-456. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4037. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Follow-up SARS-CoV-2 serological study of a health care worker cohort following COVID-19 booster vaccination.新冠病毒加强疫苗接种后医护人员队列的后续严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09338-5.
4
Prospective Longitudinal Serosurvey of Healthcare Workers in the First Wave of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Pandemic in a Quaternary Care Hospital in Munich, Germany.德国慕尼黑一家四级保健医院医护人员在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2（SARS-CoV-2）大流行第一波中前瞻性纵向血清学调查。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3055-e3065. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1935.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Dogs and Cats from Southern Germany and Northern Italy during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.德国南部和意大利北部新冠疫情第一波期间猫狗的 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
Viruses. 2021 Jul 26;13(8):1453. doi: 10.3390/v13081453.
6
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Digital Pandemic Surveillance in Germany (eCOV Study): Web Application-Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study.德国 COVID-19 疫苗有效性和数字大流行监测（eCOV 研究）：基于网络应用的前瞻性观察队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 4;26:e47070. doi: 10.2196/47070.
7
[COVID-19 infections and effectiveness of the vaccination among healthcare workers].[医护人员中的新冠病毒感染情况及疫苗接种效果]
Orv Hetil. 2023 Feb 5;164(5):163-171. doi: 10.1556/650.2023.32709.
8
Association between history of HBV vaccine response and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody response to the BioNTech/Pfizer's BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among healthcare workers in Japan: A prospective observational study.日本医护人员中乙型肝炎病毒疫苗反应史与对辉瑞/BioNTech 的 BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠疫苗刺突抗体反应的相关性：一项前瞻性观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 16;17(5):e0268529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268529. eCollection 2022.
9
Low SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence but high perception of risk among healthcare workers at children's hospital before second pandemic wave in Germany.德国第二次疫情浪潮前儿童医院医护人员 SARS-CoV-2 血清抗体流行率低，但对风险的感知率高。
World J Pediatr. 2021 Oct;17(5):484-494. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00447-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
10
Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 lineage development across the first and second waves in Eastern Germany in 2020: insights into the cause of the second wave.2020 年德国东部第一波和第二波新冠疫情期间 SARS-CoV-2 谱系发展的系统进化分析：第二波疫情成因的启示。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Jul 30;149:e177. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821001461.
引用本文的文献
1
The importance of occupation in the development of the COVID-19 pandemic.职业在新冠疫情发展中的重要性。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 May 1;49(4):231-233. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4094. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
The impact of occupational exposures on infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic: a test-negative design study with register data of 207 034 Dutch workers.职业暴露对 COVID-19 大流行期间感染率的影响：一项基于 207034 名荷兰工人登记数据的病例对照研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 May 1;49(4):259-270. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4086. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
3
COVID-19 Incidence and Vaccine Effectiveness in University Staff, 1 March 2020-2 April 2022.2020年3月1日至2022年4月2日大学教职工中的新冠病毒感染率及疫苗效力
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;11(2):483. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020483.
4
Swiss Cohort & Biobank - The White Paper.瑞士队列与生物样本库——白皮书
Public Health Rev. 2022 Dec 23;43:1605660. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1605660. eCollection 2022.
5
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复：在德国首次大流行期间，工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险：潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
本文引用的文献
1
Occupational differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: analysis of the UK ONS COVID-19 infection survey.2019冠状病毒病感染的职业差异：英国国家统计局2019冠状病毒病感染调查分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Jul 11;76(10):841-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219101.
2
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany.职业与德国首次大流行期间 108960 名工人的 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(6):446-456. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4037. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Occupation, work-related contact and SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid serological status: findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study.职业、与工作相关的接触及严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗核衣壳血清学状态：病毒监测前瞻性队列研究的结果
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Apr 21;79(11):729-35. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107920.
4
Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil.巴西异源科兴加辉瑞疫苗有效性。
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):838-843. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01701-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
5
Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults.职业与英格兰 COVID-19 死亡率：一项针对 1430 万成年人的全国关联数据研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jul;79(7):433-441. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107818. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
6
The Evolving Usefulness of the Test-negative Design in Studying Risk Factors for COVID-19.检测阴性设计在研究新冠病毒病风险因素中的作用演变
Epidemiology. 2022 Mar 1;33(2):e7-e8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001438.
7
Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants.职业与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎风险：对120075名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 9;78(5):307-14. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731.
8
A Test-Negative Design with Additional Population Controls Can Be Used to Rapidly Study Causes of the SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic.采用附加人群对照的阴性病例设计可用于快速研究导致 SARS-CoV-2 流行的原因。
Epidemiology. 2020 Nov;31(6):836-843. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001251.
Zotero 插件