• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业与德国首次大流行期间 108960 名工人的 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险。

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(6):446-456. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4037. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4037
PMID:35670286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9888438/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the occupational risk for a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nationwide sample of German workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February-31 August 2020).

METHODS

We used the data of 108 960 workers who participated in a COVID follow-up survey of the German National Cohort (NAKO). Occupational characteristics were derived from the German Classification of Occupations 2010 (Klassifikation der Berufe 2010). PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were assessed from self-reports. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using robust Poisson regression, adjusted for person-time at risk, age, sex, migration background, study center, working hours, and employment relationship.

RESULTS

The IR was 3.7 infections per 1000 workers [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-4.1]. IR differed by occupational sector, with the highest rates observed in personal (IR 4.8, 95% CI 4.0-5.6) and business administration (IR 3.4, 95% CI 2.8-3.9) services and the lowest rates in occupations related to the production of goods (IR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). Infections were more frequent among essential workers compared with workers in non-essential occupations (IRR 1.95, 95% CI 1.59-2.40) and among highly skilled compared with skilled professions (IRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The results emphasize higher infection risks in essential occupations and personal-related services, especially in the healthcare sector. Additionally, we found evidence that infections were more common in higher occupational status positions at the beginning of the pandemic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间(2 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日)德国全国范围内工人感染 SARS-CoV-2 的职业风险。

方法

我们使用了参加德国国家队列(NAKO)COVID 随访调查的 108960 名工人的数据。职业特征来自 2010 年德国职业分类(Klassifikation der Berufe 2010)。通过自我报告评估聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染。使用稳健泊松回归估计发病率(IR)和发病率比值(IRR),并调整了风险人时、年龄、性别、移民背景、研究中心、工作时间和雇佣关系。

结果

工人的 IR 为每 1000 名工人 3.7 例感染(95%置信区间[CI]为 3.3-4.1)。IR 因职业部门而异,个人(IR 4.8,95%CI 4.0-5.6)和商业管理(IR 3.4,95%CI 2.8-3.9)服务业的感染率最高,与生产相关的职业(IR 2.0,95%CI 1.5-2.6)的感染率最低。与非必要职业的工人相比,基本工人(IRR 1.95,95%CI 1.59-2.40)和高技能工人(IRR 1.36,95%CI 1.07-1.72)感染更为频繁。

结论

这些结果强调了基本职业和个人相关服务中的感染风险更高,尤其是在医疗保健部门。此外,我们发现证据表明,在大流行初期,高职业地位的感染更为普遍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62cd/9888438/7d68b4fb5a88/SJWEH-48-446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62cd/9888438/d282fce25dda/SJWEH-48-446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62cd/9888438/7d68b4fb5a88/SJWEH-48-446-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62cd/9888438/d282fce25dda/SJWEH-48-446-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62cd/9888438/7d68b4fb5a88/SJWEH-48-446-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany.职业与德国首次大流行期间 108960 名工人的 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(6):446-456. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4037. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2021.职业性感染 SARS-CoV-2 的风险:2020-2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间丹麦劳动力的全国性基于登记的研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Apr;80(4):202-208. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108713. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
Occupations Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection and Vaccination, US Blood Donors, May 2021-December 2021.2021 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月美国献血者中与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 感染和接种相关的职业。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 3;76(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac883.
5
Excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among in-person nonhealthcare workers in six states, September 2020-June 2021.2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 6 月,六个州的现场非医护人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的超额风险。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Jul;66(7):587-600. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23487. Epub 2023 May 8.
6
Healthcare workers' SARS-CoV-2 infection rates during the second wave of the pandemic: follow-up study.医护人员在第二波大流行期间感染 SARS-CoV-2 的比率:随访研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):530-539. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4049. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential Workers During a Prevaccination COVID-19 Surge in Arizona.亚利桑那州 COVID-19 疫情激增期间,医护人员、急救人员和其他必要工作人员的 SARS-CoV-2 感染发生率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 22;2(10):e213318. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3318. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
A Comparative Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality per Disease Groups in Germany Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic From 2016 to 2020.2016 年至 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行前后德国各疾病组院内死亡率的对比分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48649.
9
Changes in all-cause and cause-specific mortality by occupational skill during COVID-19 epidemic in Spain.西班牙新冠疫情期间按职业技能划分的全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率变化
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 Oct 9;78(11):669-674. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222065.
10
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.德国第一波疫情期间工作人员的职业与感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的风险:偏差可能性
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):586-587. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4052. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection in high income countries: highlighting the need for an intersectional perspective in quantitative research.高收入国家中新冠病毒感染方面的社会不平等:强调定量研究中采用交叉性视角的必要性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;13:1642407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1642407. eCollection 2025.
2
SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by non-healthcare occupations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非医疗职业的新冠病毒感染风险:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2025 May 22;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00462-9.
3
Driving under viral impairment: Linking acute SARS-CoV-2 infections to elevated car crash risks.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection - First results from an analysis of surveillance data from Germany.2019冠状病毒病感染风险中的社会经济不平等——来自德国监测数据分析的初步结果
J Health Monit. 2020 Oct 9;5(Suppl 7):18-29. doi: 10.25646/7057.
2
Occupational risk of COVID-19 in the first versus second epidemic wave in Norway, 2020.2020 年挪威第一波与第二波疫情期间的 COVID-19 职业风险。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Oct;26(40). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.40.2001875.
3
[Social inequalities in the regional spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections].
病毒感染导致的驾驶能力受损:将急性SARS-CoV-2感染与车祸风险升高联系起来。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0004420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004420. eCollection 2025.
4
Occupational and non-occupational factors of post-COVID-19 condition: a cross-sectional survey in the French general working population.新冠后状况的职业和非职业因素:法国普通劳动人口的横断面调查
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;3(1):e001613. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001613. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Occupational risks of COVID-19: a case-cohort study using health insurance claims data in Germany.COVID-19 职业风险:基于德国医疗保险索赔数据的病例队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):3235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20706-3.
6
Long-term course and factors influencing work ability and return to work in post-COVID patients 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation.新冠患者住院康复12个月后的长期病程以及影响工作能力和重返工作岗位的因素
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2024 Nov 1;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12995-024-00443-4.
7
Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behavior: using the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021.探索促进与健康相关的预防行为的组织方面:以德国 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 11 月期间与工作相关的 SARS-CoV-2 感染控制措施为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1388996. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388996. eCollection 2024.
8
Health impact of the COVID-19 in Spanish non-healthcare workers by gender: Use of sickness absence for surveillance.COVID-19 对西班牙非医护工作者的健康影响:利用病假进行监测。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 9;19(10):e0307224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307224. eCollection 2024.
9
Managing the work stress of inpatient nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of organizational interventions.应对新冠疫情期间住院部护士的工作压力:组织干预措施的系统评价
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02358-1.
10
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review.职业与 SARS-CoV-2 在欧洲:综述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 18;33(173). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2024. Print 2024 Jul.
[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)感染区域传播中的社会不平等现象]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Sep;64(9):1116-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03387-w. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
4
[Epidemiological approaches to address key research questions on COVID-19-an overview].[解决关于新冠病毒关键研究问题的流行病学方法——概述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Sep;64(9):1076-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03378-x. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
Revisiting Overadjustment Bias.重新审视过度调整偏差。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):e22-e23. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001377.
6
Large variation in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence among essential workers in Geneva, Switzerland.瑞士日内瓦基本工作人员中抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体流行率存在较大差异。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 8;12(1):3455. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23796-4.
7
COVID-19 Workplace Outbreaks by Industry Sector and Their Associated Household Transmission, Ontario, Canada, January to June, 2020.2020 年 1 月至 6 月加拿大安大略省按行业部门划分的 COVID-19 工作场所暴发及其相关家庭传播情况。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jul 1;63(7):574-580. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002201.
8
The COVID-19 pandemic: one year later - an occupational perspective.新冠疫情:一年之后——职业视角
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 May 1;47(4):245-247. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3956. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Occupation- and age-associated risk of SARS-CoV-2 test positivity, the Netherlands, June to October 2020.2020 年 6 月至 10 月,荷兰与职业和年龄相关的 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性风险。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Dec;25(50). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.50.2001884.
10
Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants.职业与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎风险:对120075名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 9;78(5):307-14. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731.