• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol.心脏手术后心房颤动的多变量预测模型:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 13;13(3):e067260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.使用机器学习技术的预测模型研究的方法学和报告质量的系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 11;10(11):e038832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038832.
4
Prediction models for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a protocol for systematic review and critical appraisal.危重症患者急性肾损伤预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e046274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046274.
5
Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: identifying candidate predictors through a Delphi process.心脏手术后心房颤动:通过德尔菲法确定候选预测因子。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e086589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086589.
6
Prognostic prediction models for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: protocol for a scoping review.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复的预后预测模型:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e061420. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061420.
7
Prognostic prediction models for clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with visceral leishmaniasis: protocol for a systematic review.诊断为内脏利什曼病患者的临床结局预后预测模型的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e075597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075597.
8
Clinical prediction models for multidrug-resistant organism colonisation or infection in critically ill patients: a systematic review protocol.临床预测模型在危重症患者中对多重耐药菌定植或感染的预测:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e064566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064566.
9
Critical appraisal and assessment of bias among studies evaluating risk prediction models for in-hospital and 30-day mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review.系统评价:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院和 30 天死亡率风险预测模型评估的偏倚的评价和评估:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e085930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085930.
10
Physical functioning outcome measures in the lumbar spinal surgery population and measurement properties of the physical outcome measures: protocol for a systematic review.腰椎脊柱手术人群的身体功能结局测量及身体结局测量的测量特性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 6;12(6):e060950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060950.

引用本文的文献

1
Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: identifying candidate predictors through a Delphi process.心脏手术后心房颤动:通过德尔菲法确定候选预测因子。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 25;14(9):e086589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086589.

本文引用的文献

1
The Strengths and Weaknesses of Left Atrial Appendage Ligation or Exclusion (LARIAT, AtriaClip, Surgical Suture).左心耳结扎或切除术(LARIAT、AtriaClip、手术缝线)的优缺点。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2022 Apr;11(2):205-217. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
2
Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial.心脏手术后行左后心包切开术预防心房颤动:一项适应性、单中心、单盲、随机、对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2075-2083. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02490-9. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
3
Predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a scoping review of associated factors and systematic review of existing prediction models.心脏手术后房颤的预测:相关因素的范围综述及现有预测模型的系统综述
Perfusion. 2023 Jan;38(1):92-108. doi: 10.1177/02676591211037025. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure.伞形方案:对为预测心力衰竭患者临床结局而开发的多变量生物标志物预后模型的系统评价。
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Aug 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00081-4. eCollection 2020.
6
Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and cardiac valve surgery.在接受冠状动脉搭桥手术和心脏瓣膜手术的患者中同时进行心房颤动消融术。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):2172-2178. doi: 10.1111/jce.14408. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58. doi: 10.7326/M18-1376.
9
Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.心血管麻醉医师协会/欧洲心胸麻醉医师协会关于心脏手术患者围手术期心房颤动管理的实践指南
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jan;33(1):12-26. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.09.039.
10
Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Practice Advisory for the Management of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.心血管麻醉医师学会/欧洲心胸麻醉医师协会关于心脏手术患者围手术期心房颤动管理的实践建议。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jan;128(1):33-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003865.

心脏手术后心房颤动的多变量预测模型:系统评价方案。

Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 13;13(3):e067260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067260
PMID:36914189
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10016290/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dozens of multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS) have been published, but none have been incorporated into regular clinical practice. One of the reasons for this lack of adoption is poor model performance due to methodological weaknesses in model development. In addition, there has been little external validation of these existing models to evaluate their reproducibility and transportability. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise the methodology and risk of bias of papers presenting the development and/or validation of models for AFACS.

METHODS

We will identify studies that present the development and/or validation of a multivariable prediction model for AFACS through searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to 31 December 2021. Pairs of reviewers will independently extract model performance measures, assess methodological quality and assess risk of bias of included studies using extraction forms adapted from a combination of the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies checklist and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Extracted information will be reported by narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systemic review will only include published aggregate data, so no protected health information will be used. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference presentations. Further, this review will identify weaknesses in past AFACS prediction model development and validation methodology so that subsequent studies can improve upon prior practices and produce a clinically useful risk estimation tool.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019127329.

摘要

简介

已经有数十种用于心脏手术后心房颤动(AFACS)的多变量预测模型发表,但没有一种被纳入常规临床实践。导致这种缺乏采用的原因之一是由于模型开发方法学上的弱点,导致模型性能不佳。此外,这些现有模型的外部验证很少,无法评估其再现性和可转移性。本系统评价的目的是批判性地评估介绍 AFACS 模型开发和/或验证的论文的方法学和偏倚风险。

方法

我们将通过搜索 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science,从成立到 2021 年 12 月 31 日,确定介绍 AFACS 多变量预测模型开发和/或验证的研究。 pairs of reviewers 将独立提取模型性能指标,使用从预测模型风险评估工具和预测模型评估的系统评价的批判性评估和数据提取清单的组合中改编的提取表,评估纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险。提取的信息将通过叙述性综合和描述性统计报告。

伦理与传播

本系统评价仅包括已发表的汇总数据,因此不会使用受保护的健康信息。研究结果将通过同行评议的出版物和科学会议报告进行传播。此外,本综述将确定过去 AFACS 预测模型开发和验证方法学的弱点,以便随后的研究能够改进先前的实践,并产生一种临床有用的风险估计工具。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019127329。