Koutantou Myrto, Kambas Konstantinos, Makka Sofia, Fournier Pierre-Edouard, Raoult Didier, Angelakis Emmanouil
Diagnostic Department and Public Health Laboratories, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2023 Mar 4;2023:4222511. doi: 10.1155/2023/4222511. eCollection 2023.
Cat scratch disease (CSD) is the most common cause of bacterial infectious lymphadenopathy, especially in children, but its diagnosis still remains challenging. Serological assays are widely applied due to their simplicity and the non-invasive sampling. However, these techniques present several limitations, including not well-defined antigen preparation, assay conditions and cutoff titers, severe cross-reactions with other species and organisms, and the notably ranging seroprevalence in the normal population. The objective of this study is to review the literature in order to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD.
Databases including PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Google were searched to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD. A total of 437 papers were identified and screened, and after exclusion of papers that did not fulfill the including criteria, 63 papers were used.
It was revealed that sensitivities of serological assays varied from 10% to 100%. Indeed, more than half of the studies reported a sensitivity lower than 70%, while 71% of them had a sensitivity lower than 80%. Moreover, specificities of serological assays ranged from 15% to 100%, with 25 assays reporting a specificity lower than 90%.
It is considered that molecular assays should be the gold standard technique for CSD confirmation, and physicians are reinforced to proceed to lymph node biopsy in suspicious CSD cases.
猫抓病(CSD)是细菌性感染性淋巴结病最常见的病因,尤其是在儿童中,但它的诊断仍然具有挑战性。血清学检测因其操作简便和采样无创而被广泛应用。然而,这些技术存在一些局限性,包括抗原制备不明确、检测条件和临界滴度、与其他物种和生物体的严重交叉反应,以及正常人群中血清阳性率差异显著。本研究的目的是回顾文献,以确定诊断CSD的最佳诊断程序。
检索包括PubMed、Medline、谷歌学术和谷歌在内的数据库,以确定诊断CSD的最佳诊断程序。共识别和筛选了437篇论文,排除不符合纳入标准的论文后,使用了63篇论文。
结果显示,血清学检测的敏感性从10%到100%不等。事实上,超过一半的研究报告敏感性低于70%,而其中71%的研究敏感性低于80%。此外,血清学检测的特异性范围为15%至100%,25项检测报告特异性低于90%。
认为分子检测应是确诊CSD的金标准技术,并且建议医生在可疑CSD病例中进行淋巴结活检。