• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性使用输尿管镜检查与环境足迹:当前证据回顾。

Single-Use Ureteroscopy and Environmental Footprint: Review of Current Evidence.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Jun;24(6):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9
PMID:36917340
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ureteroscopy is a well-established treatment modality for kidney and ureteric calculi in addition to playing a key role in upper tract cancer diagnostics. Traditional reusable flexible ureteroscopes are technologically advanced and expensive pieces of equipment that require repeat sterilisation and periodical repair. These issues have led to the development of single-use flexible ureteroscopes that are disposed of after each case. Whilst this may be advantageous in many respects, the environmental impact of such technology is yet to be fully determined. The aim of this review is to therefore identify and summarise the available literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy.

RECENT FINDINGS

To identify the latest research on this topic, a systematic search of world literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed and articles were assessed by all authors and relevant study results were included in a narrative format. Only one relevant article was identified and included. This study found that a single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue by Boston Scientific) generated an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide per case to a contemporary reusable flexible ureteroscope. Literature concerning the environmental footprint of single-use ureteroscopy is worryingly lacking. No conclusions can be definitively drawn from a single study and further research is imperative given the global climate crisis and the significant contribution that healthcare services have to the environmental problem.

摘要

目的综述

输尿管镜检查术是一种成熟的治疗肾结石和输尿管结石的方法,此外在诊断上尿路癌方面也起着关键作用。传统的可重复使用的软性输尿管镜是技术先进且昂贵的设备,需要反复消毒和定期维修。这些问题导致了一次性使用的软性输尿管镜的发展,这些输尿管镜在每个病例后都被丢弃。虽然从许多方面来看,这可能是有利的,但这种技术的环境影响尚未得到充分确定。本综述的目的是确定和总结有关一次性输尿管镜术的环境足迹的现有文献。

最近发现

为了确定关于这一主题的最新研究,我们使用 Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库对世界范围内的文献进行了系统搜索。我们遵循了 PRISMA 指南,所有作者都对文章进行了评估,并以叙述的形式纳入了相关的研究结果。只确定了一篇相关的文章并将其包括在内。这项研究发现,一次性使用的软性输尿管镜(波士顿科学公司的 LithoVue)在每个病例中产生的二氧化碳量与当代可重复使用的软性输尿管镜相同。关于一次性输尿管镜术的环境足迹的文献令人担忧地缺乏。由于全球气候危机和医疗服务对环境问题的重大贡献,从单一研究中不能得出明确的结论,因此需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Single-Use Ureteroscopy and Environmental Footprint: Review of Current Evidence.一次性使用输尿管镜检查与环境足迹:当前证据回顾。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Jun;24(6):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01154-9. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.软性输尿管镜检查中的碳足迹:可重复使用和一次性使用输尿管镜对环境影响的比较研究。
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):214-217. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0001. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.一项前瞻性病例对照研究:比较一次性使用的软性可抛弃输尿管镜LithoVue与软性可重复使用的纤维光学输尿管镜。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):468-475. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0027. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
4
Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.一次性使用数码输尿管软镜:一项离体评估和成本分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14235.
5
Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.新型一次性使用数字柔性输尿管镜与非一次性使用纤维光学和数字输尿管镜在尸体模型中的比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Jun;30(6):655-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0051. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?一次性使用软性输尿管镜:它们与可重复使用的输尿管镜相比如何?
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):71-78. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0785. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.比较一次性使用输尿管镜与可重复使用输尿管镜的治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01537-8.
8
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.新型一次性使用软性输尿管镜的评估。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):903-907. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.微观成本分析表明,与可重复使用的软性纤维输尿管镜相比,LithoVue的成本相当。
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):267-273. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0523. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.当前的一次性输尿管镜:在标准化肾脏模型中的性能和局限性。
J Endourol. 2020 Oct;34(10):1015-1020. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0185. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy.经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的碳足迹
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 30;6(8):e70063. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70063. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: practice patterns, attitudes, and preferences for next-generation concepts.一次性使用软性输尿管镜:下一代概念的实践模式、态度及偏好
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 4;11:1419682. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1419682. eCollection 2024.
3
Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions.一次性使用软性输尿管镜:现状与未来方向。

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes.估算一次性内镜设备和内镜的环境影响。
Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1326-1331. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324729. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Single use and reusable flexible ureteroscopies for the treatment of urinary stones: A comparative study of perioperative complications.
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jul 5;4(6):613-621. doi: 10.1002/bco2.265. eCollection 2023 Nov.
一次性使用与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗尿路结石:围手术期并发症的对比研究。
Prog Urol. 2021 May;31(6):368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.11.014. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: how to choose and what is around the corner?一次性使用软性输尿管镜:如何选择以及未来的发展趋势?
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):87-94. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000852.
5
Worldwide survey of flexible ureteroscopy practice: a survey from European Association of Urology sections of young academic urologists and uro-technology groups.全球输尿管软镜操作调查:来自欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学术泌尿外科医生和泌尿技术小组的调查
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(4):393-397. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.0041. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.可重复使用的软性输尿管肾镜比一次性输尿管肾镜更具成本效益:PETRA泌尿学组的系统评价结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.06.13.
7
Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an comparative analysis.当前一次性使用的数字柔性输尿管镜与其可重复使用的同类产品的特点:一项比较分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S359-S370. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.17.
8
Reducing Pollution From the Health Care Industry.减少医疗保健行业的污染。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1043-1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10823.
9
The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems.手术对全球气候的影响:三个卫生系统中手术室的碳足迹研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Dec;1(9):e381-e388. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.一次性使用数码输尿管软镜:一项离体评估和成本分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14235.