HEAD Lab, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 May;51(5):875-904. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03148-7. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Head injuries are common for cyclists involved in collisions. Such collision scenarios result in a range of injuries, with different head impact speeds, angles, locations, or surfaces. A clear understanding of these collision characteristics is vital to design high fidelity test methods for evaluating the performance of helmets. We review literature detailing real-world cyclist collision scenarios and report on these key characteristics. Our review shows that helmeted cyclists have a considerable reduction in skull fracture and focal brain pathologies compared to non-helmeted cyclists, as well as a reduction in all brain pathologies. The considerable reduction in focal head pathologies is likely to be due to helmet standards mandating thresholds of linear acceleration. The less considerable reduction in diffuse brain injuries is likely to be due to the lack of monitoring head rotation in test methods. We performed a novel meta-analysis of the location of 1809 head impacts from ten studies. Most studies showed that the side and front regions are frequently impacted, with one large, contemporary study highlighting a high proportion of occipital impacts. Helmets frequently had impact locations low down near the rim line. The face is not well protected by most conventional bicycle helmets. Several papers determine head impact speed and angle from in-depth reconstructions and computer simulations. They report head impact speeds from 5 to 16 m/s, with a concentration around 5 to 8 m/s and higher speeds when there was another vehicle involved in the collision. Reported angles range from 10° to 80° to the normal, and are concentrated around 30°-50°. Our review also shows that in nearly 80% of the cases, the head impact is reported to be against a flat surface. This review highlights current gaps in data, and calls for more research and data to better inform improvements in testing methods of standards and rating schemes and raise helmet safety.
头部损伤在涉及碰撞的自行车骑手身上很常见。这种碰撞场景会导致一系列损伤,包括不同的头部撞击速度、角度、位置或表面。清楚地了解这些碰撞特征对于设计高保真度的头盔性能评估测试方法至关重要。我们回顾了详细描述现实世界中自行车手碰撞场景的文献,并报告了这些关键特征。我们的综述表明,与未戴头盔的自行车手相比,戴头盔的自行车手颅骨骨折和局灶性脑病理的发生率明显降低,所有脑病理的发生率也都降低了。局灶性头部病理的显著降低可能是由于头盔标准要求线性加速度阈值。弥漫性脑损伤的降低程度不太明显,可能是由于测试方法中缺乏对头旋转的监测。我们对来自十个研究的 1809 个头部撞击位置进行了一项新颖的荟萃分析。大多数研究表明,侧面和正面是经常受到撞击的区域,有一项大型的当代研究突出显示了枕部撞击的比例很高。头盔的撞击位置经常靠近边缘线的低处。大多数传统自行车头盔并不能很好地保护面部。有几篇论文从深入的重建和计算机模拟中确定了头部撞击速度和角度。它们报告的头部撞击速度从 5 到 16 m/s,集中在 5 到 8 m/s 之间,当碰撞中有另一辆车时,速度会更高。报告的角度范围从 10°到 80°到正常,集中在 30°-50°之间。我们的综述还表明,在近 80%的情况下,报告头部撞击是撞击平坦表面。这篇综述强调了目前数据的差距,并呼吁进行更多的研究和数据收集,以更好地为改进测试方法、标准和评级方案提供信息,并提高头盔的安全性。