Randell Heather, Klein Peter
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Penn State, University Park, PA, USA.
Programs in Sociology and Environmental and Urban Studies, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, USA.
Soc Nat Resour. 2021;34(9):1232-1249. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2021.1948649. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
The Brazilian Amazon has long served as a site of infrastructure development and natural resource extraction. Development projects including dams and mines have largely benefitted distant urban actors at a cost to local communities and the environment. We draw from theories of internal colonialism and environmental justice to examine the ways that dam building undermined the well-being of communities affected by construction of the Belo Monte Dam, and to understand how those communities engaged in collective action to minimize negative impacts on their livelihoods. Drawing from semi-structured interview and ethnographic data, we find that farmers and fishers impacted by Belo Monte used a variety of tactics to resist exploitation and ultimately receive more equitable compensation for their losses. We propose two processes were central to their success in mobilizing for environmental justice: and .
长期以来,巴西亚马逊地区一直是基础设施建设和自然资源开采的场所。包括水坝和矿山在内的开发项目在很大程度上使遥远的城市参与者受益,却让当地社区和环境付出了代价。我们借鉴内部殖民主义和环境正义理论,来审视水坝建设损害受贝洛蒙特大坝建设影响社区福祉的方式,并了解这些社区如何采取集体行动,将对其生计的负面影响降至最低。通过半结构化访谈和人种志数据,我们发现,受贝洛蒙特大坝影响的农民和渔民采用了多种策略来抵制剥削,并最终为其损失获得更公平的补偿。我们认为有两个过程对他们成功推动环境正义至关重要: 和 。