Kim Seontaik, Kim Peter Beomcheol, Lee Gyumin
Department of Business Administration, Earl G. Graves School of Business and Management, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA.
School of Hospitality and Tourism, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland, New Zealand.
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Feb;93:102797. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102797. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
This study develops and tests a research model to explain and predict how and when organizational safety climate influences hospitality employees' safety performance behaviors by proposing two boundary conditions: communication transparency and safety-related stigma based on expectancy-valence theory. Specifically, we examined if communication transparency intensifies the impact of perceived safety climate on employees' safety motivation that drives safety performance behaviors through prevention work focus and if safety-related stigma attenuates the links between safety motivation and safety performance behaviors. Based on two national samples of 214 South Korean and 240 U.S. foodservice employees, this research found that safety climate was positively associated with safety motivation, prompting safety behaviors with the key mediating mechanism of prevention focus work. However, there were different patterns observed for the moderating roles of communication transparency and stigma for the foodservice employees between South Korea and the United States. Implications of the findings are discussed for hospitality researchers and practitioners.
本研究基于期望效价理论,通过提出沟通透明度和与安全相关的污名这两个边界条件,开发并测试了一个研究模型,以解释和预测组织安全氛围如何以及何时影响酒店员工的安全绩效行为。具体而言,我们考察了沟通透明度是否会增强感知到的安全氛围对员工安全动机的影响,而这种动机通过预防工作重点来推动安全绩效行为;以及与安全相关的污名是否会削弱安全动机与安全绩效行为之间的联系。基于对214名韩国和240名美国食品服务员工的两个全国性样本,本研究发现安全氛围与安全动机呈正相关,通过预防重点工作这一关键中介机制促使安全行为的产生。然而,韩国和美国食品服务员工在沟通透明度和污名的调节作用方面呈现出不同的模式。研究结果对酒店业研究人员和从业者的启示也进行了讨论。