Gray Cheryl E, Merlo Kelsey L, Lawrence Roxanne C, Doaty Jeremiah, Allen Tammy D
Montclair State University, Department of Psychology, Montclair, NJ and University of South Florida, Department of Psychology, Tampa, FL, USA.
University of South Florida, Department of Psychology, Tampa, FL, USA.
Saf Sci. 2023 Feb;158:105950. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105950. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
The COVID-19 pandemic threatened employees' health and safety more than any event in recent years. Although millions of employees transitioned to working from home to mitigate infectious disease exposure, many worksites re-opened amid the pandemic as high infection rates persisted longer than expected. Safety guidelines were issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and other national initiatives to improve the health and safety of employees returning to on-site work. The current work addresses predictors of infection control safety behaviors in a general working population that largely lacks infection control training and expertise. Drawing from Neal and Griffin's model of safety behavior, we investigated organizational factors (i.e., perceived safety climate, safety-related organizational constraints, occupational risk of COVID-19 exposure) and individual factors (i.e., infection control safety attitudes, conscientiousness, and risk aversion) associated with employees' infection control safety behaviors shortly after returning to on-site work during the pandemic. Survey results from 89 full-time employees across industries demonstrated that the organizational and individual factors accounted for 51.19 percent of the variance in employees' infection control safety behaviors. Organizational factors accounted for 49.02 percent of the explained variance, and individual factors accounted for 50.98 percent of the explained variance. Conscientiousness, perceived safety climate, safety-related organizational constraints, and infection control safety attitudes explained significant variance in employees' infection control safety behaviors, while the occupational risk of COVID-19 exposure and risk aversion did not. Organizations may benefit from considering employees' conscientiousness and safety attitudes during employee selection as well as enhancing their organization's safety climate and mitigating safety-related organizational constraints.
新冠疫情对员工健康与安全构成的威胁超过了近年来的任何事件。尽管数百万员工转而居家办公以减少传染病暴露风险,但由于感染率居高不下的持续时间超过预期,许多工作场所仍在疫情期间重新开放。美国疾病控制与预防中心、世界卫生组织以及其他国家倡议机构发布了安全指南,以改善重返现场工作的员工的健康与安全状况。当前的研究探讨了在普遍缺乏感染控制培训和专业知识的普通工作人群中,感染控制安全行为的预测因素。借鉴尼尔和格里芬的安全行为模型,我们调查了与员工在疫情期间重返现场工作后不久的感染控制安全行为相关的组织因素(即感知到的安全氛围、与安全相关的组织限制、新冠病毒暴露的职业风险)和个人因素(即感染控制安全态度、尽责性和风险规避)。来自89名各行各业全职员工的调查结果表明,组织因素和个人因素占员工感染控制安全行为方差的51.19%。组织因素占解释方差的49.02%,个人因素占解释方差的50.98%。尽责性、感知到的安全氛围、与安全相关的组织限制以及感染控制安全态度在员工的感染控制安全行为中解释了显著的方差,而新冠病毒暴露的职业风险和风险规避则没有。组织在员工选拔过程中考虑员工的尽责性和安全态度,以及改善组织的安全氛围和减轻与安全相关的组织限制,可能会有所裨益。