Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.
Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J Ment Health. 2024 Apr;33(2):253-273. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2182428. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
Work-related stress negatively impacts employee wellbeing. Stress-management interventions that reduce workplace stress can be challenging. Immersive technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), may provide an alternative.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of immersive technologies to promote workplace wellbeing (PROSPERO 268460).
Databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Embase were searched until 22 July 2021. Studies were included if they tested a workforce or were designed for a workplace. Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP) was used for quality ratings.
There were 17 studies ( = 1270), published 2011-2021. Over half were conducted in Europe. Eight studies were controlled trials. Most studies involved brief, single sessions of immersive VR and provided evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness when measuring wellbeing-related variables such as stress, relaxation, and restoration. VR environments included relaxation tasks such as meditation or breathing exercises, and nature-based stimuli, such as forests, beaches, and water. Studies tested office workers, healthcare professionals, social workers, teachers, and military personnel. EPHPP ratings were "strong" ( = 1), "moderate" ( = 13), and "weak" ( = 3).
VR relaxation appears helpful for workplaces. However, limited longer-term data, controlled trials, and naturalistic studies mean conclusions must be drawn cautiously.
工作相关的压力对员工的健康产生负面影响。减少工作场所压力的压力管理干预措施可能具有挑战性。沉浸式技术,如虚拟现实(VR),可能提供一种替代方案。
本系统评价旨在评估沉浸式技术促进工作场所健康的可行性、可接受性和有效性(PROSPERO 268460)。
直到 2021 年 7 月 22 日,检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 Embase 数据库。如果研究测试了劳动力或专为工作场所设计,则将其纳入研究。使用有效的公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具(EPHPP)进行质量评级。
共有 17 项研究( = 1270 人),发表于 2011 年至 2021 年。其中一半以上在欧洲进行。八项研究为对照试验。大多数研究涉及短暂的、单次的沉浸式 VR,当测量与健康相关的变量(如压力、放松和恢复)时,提供了可行性、可接受性和有效性的证据。VR 环境包括放松任务,如冥想或呼吸练习,以及自然刺激,如森林、海滩和水。研究测试了办公室工作人员、医疗保健专业人员、社会工作者、教师和军人。EPHPP 评级为“强”( = 1)、“中等”( = 13)和“弱”( = 3)。
VR 放松似乎对工作场所有益。然而,有限的长期数据、对照试验和自然主义研究意味着必须谨慎得出结论。