• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算平均压缩性纤维腺体组织厚度和乳腺成分对日本女性掩蔽风险分层的有效性。

Validity of computed mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness and breast composition for stratification of masking risk in Japanese women.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, 460-0001, Japan.

Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, 460-0001, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2023 Jul;30(4):541-551. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01444-7. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-023-01444-7
PMID:36920730
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The volumetric measurement system for mammographic breast density is a high-precision objective method for evaluating the percentage of fibroglandular tissue volume (FG%). Nonetheless, FG% does not precisely correlate with subjective visual estimation (SVE) and shows poor evaluation performance regarding masking risk in patients with comparatively thin compressed breast thickness (CBT), commonly found in Japanese women. We considered that the mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness (mCGT), which incorporates the CBT element into the evaluation of breast density, may better predict masking risk.

METHODS

Volumetric measurements and SVEs were performed on mammograms of 108 breast cancer patients from our center. mCGT was calculated as the product of CBT and FG%. SVE was classified using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification, 5th edition. Subsequently, the performance of mCGT, SVE, and FG% in predicting masking risk was estimated using the AUC.

RESULTS

The AUC values of mCGT and SVE were 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.92) and 0.78 (0.66-0.86), respectively (P = 0.16). The AUC of the FG% was 0.65 (0.52-0.77), which was significantly lower than that of mCGT (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of mCGT in predicting negative detection were 89% and 71%, respectively; of SVE 83% and 61% (versus 72% and 57% with FG%), suggesting that mCGT was superior to FG% in both sensitivity and specificity, and comparable with SVE.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective mCGT calculated from the volumetric measurement system will highly likely be useful in evaluating breast density and supporting visual assessment for masking risk stratification.

摘要

背景

乳腺密度的容积测量系统是一种评估纤维腺体组织体积百分比(FG%)的高精度客观方法。然而,FG%与主观视觉评估(SVE)并不完全相关,并且在评估比较薄的压缩乳腺厚度(CBT)患者的隐匿风险方面表现不佳,这种情况在日本女性中很常见。我们认为,将 CBT 元素纳入乳腺密度评估的平均压缩纤维腺体组织厚度(mCGT)可能更好地预测隐匿风险。

方法

对来自我们中心的 108 名乳腺癌患者的乳腺 X 线照片进行容积测量和 SVE。mCGT 计算为 CBT 与 FG%的乘积。SVE 使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统分类,第 5 版进行分类。然后,使用 AUC 评估 mCGT、SVE 和 FG%在预测隐匿风险方面的性能。

结果

mCGT 和 SVE 的 AUC 值分别为 0.84(95%置信区间,0.71-0.92)和 0.78(0.66-0.86)(P=0.16)。FG%的 AUC 为 0.65(0.52-0.77),明显低于 mCGT(P<0.001)。mCGT 预测阴性检出的灵敏度和特异性分别为 89%和 71%;SVE 为 83%和 61%(与 FG%分别为 72%和 57%),提示 mCGT 在灵敏度和特异性方面均优于 FG%,与 SVE 相当。

结论

从容积测量系统计算出的客观 mCGT 很可能有助于评估乳腺密度,并支持视觉评估进行隐匿风险分层。

相似文献

1
Validity of computed mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness and breast composition for stratification of masking risk in Japanese women.计算平均压缩性纤维腺体组织厚度和乳腺成分对日本女性掩蔽风险分层的有效性。
Breast Cancer. 2023 Jul;30(4):541-551. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01444-7. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.可否通过对乳腺密度的定量评估(“容积测量”)来预测致密乳腺组织的掩盖风险?与日本放射科医生的主观视觉评估进行比较的调查研究。
Breast Cancer. 2019 May;26(3):349-358. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0930-0. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
3
Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.利用乳腺体积密度图对乳腺钼靶筛查中的掩盖风险进行量化。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;162(3):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4137-4. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
4
Relation between Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: Considering BMI, Compressed Breast Thickness and Age of Women in Tabriz, Iran.乳腺钼靶实质模式与乳腺癌风险之间的关系:考虑伊朗大不里士女性的体重指数、乳房压缩厚度和年龄
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(4):2259-63. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.4.2259.
5
Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.乳腺钼靶密度与乳腺磁共振成像估计的纤维腺体组织体积之间的相关性。
Med Phys. 2004 Apr;31(4):933-42. doi: 10.1118/1.1668512.
6
Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.基于模拟病变的衍生乳腺 X 线摄影屏蔽措施可预测已知危险因素控制后间隔期癌症的风险:病例对照分析。
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1309-1316. doi: 10.1002/mp.13410. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.基于密度和纹理特征预测筛查性乳腺 X 光摄影中的癌症隐匿。
Acad Radiol. 2019 May;26(5):608-619. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.使用基于人工神经网络的全场数字化乳腺摄影校准自动估计乳腺体积密度:对日本乳腺癌患者和非乳腺癌患者的可行性研究
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Apr;30(2):215-227. doi: 10.1007/s10278-016-9922-9.
9
Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.BI-RADS第4版和第5版中乳腺密度视觉评估与自动容积测量的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Sep;209(3):703-708. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17525. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.采用半自动和全自动方法及乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估乳腺癌风险和乳腺钼靶密度
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):348-355. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of breast size and composition on the accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography in breast cancer screening.乳房大小和组成对乳腺癌筛查中乳腺X线摄影和超声检查准确性的影响。
Breast Cancer. 2025 Mar;32(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01664-5. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Identifying factors that indicate the possibility of non-visible cases on mammograms using mammary gland content ratio estimated by artificial intelligence.利用人工智能估算的乳腺含量比率来识别乳房X光检查中显示不可见病例可能性的因素。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 5;14:1255109. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1255109. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.巴赫切希尔乳腺钼靶筛查项目中女性乳腺密度的定性和体积评估比较以及乳腺压缩参数和乳腺体积分析
Eur J Breast Health. 2020 Apr 1;16(2):110-116. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.4943. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: experience of use of the ScreenPoint Medical Transpara system in 310 Japanese women.人工智能在乳腺 X 线摄影中的乳腺癌检测:310 例日本女性使用 ScreenPoint Medical Transpara 系统的经验。
Breast Cancer. 2020 Jul;27(4):642-651. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01061-8. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.孤立人工智能在乳腺钼靶摄影中的乳腺癌检测:与 101 位放射科医生的比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):916-922. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy222.
4
A Review of the Role of Augmented Intelligence in Breast Imaging: From Automated Breast Density Assessment to Risk Stratification.增强智能在乳腺成像中的作用综述:从自动乳腺密度评估到风险分层。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):259-270. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20391. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.可否通过对乳腺密度的定量评估(“容积测量”)来预测致密乳腺组织的掩盖风险?与日本放射科医生的主观视觉评估进行比较的调查研究。
Breast Cancer. 2019 May;26(3):349-358. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0930-0. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
6
Deep Learning for Mammographic Breast Density Assessment and Beyond.用于乳腺钼靶密度评估及其他方面的深度学习
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):59-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018182116. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Deep learning beyond cats and dogs: recent advances in diagnosing breast cancer with deep neural networks.超越猫狗识别的深度学习:深度神经网络在乳腺癌诊断中的最新进展
Br J Radiol. 2018 Sep;91(1089):20170545. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170545. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.五种测量乳腺密度方法的比较:病例对照研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 5;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0932-z.
9
Breast compression parameters and mammographic density in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.挪威乳腺癌筛查计划中的乳房压迫参数和乳房 X 光密度。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1662-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5104-5. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.日本女性乳腺钼靶密度的数字容积测量及癌症漏诊风险
Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep;24(5):708-713. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0763-2. Epub 2017 Feb 25.