Faltus Timo
Faculty of Law, Economics and Business, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle an der Saale, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 27;11:1124131. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1124131. eCollection 2023.
In addition to classic genetic engineering for the targeted modification of the base sequence of the DNA, epigenetic methods for the targeted modification of the genetic material without base changes are increasingly being used. Such epigenetic techniques can be used, for example, to influence stress tolerance to heat or aridity in plants. The regulatory handling of organisms generated by means of epigenetic techniques on the grounds of genetic engineering law has not yet been clarified. This paper critically reviews the legal classification of epigenetically modified organisms as GMOs as expressed in the study on New Genomic Techniques published in April 2021 by the European Commission. The paper shows that there are reasons to assume that epigenetically modified organisms are not covered by the European GMO legislation. In addition, the paper provides an introductory overview of the significance of epigenetics and the methods used to intentionally influence epigenetic traits and illustrates the possibility for a consistent, risk-based regulation of epigenetic modifications.
除了用于靶向修饰DNA碱基序列的经典基因工程外,越来越多地使用在不改变碱基的情况下靶向修饰遗传物质的表观遗传方法。例如,这种表观遗传技术可用于影响植物对高温或干旱的耐受性。基于基因工程法对通过表观遗传技术产生的生物体进行监管的问题尚未明确。本文批判性地审视了欧盟委员会2021年4月发表的关于新基因组技术的研究中所表达的将表观遗传修饰生物体归类为转基因生物的法律分类。该论文表明,有理由认为表观遗传修饰生物体不在欧洲转基因生物立法的涵盖范围内。此外,本文还对表观遗传学的重要性以及用于有意影响表观遗传特征的方法进行了初步概述,并说明了对表观遗传修饰进行基于风险的一致监管的可能性。