Suppr超能文献

电子烟使用和危害认知的社会人口学差异。

Sociodemographic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake and Perceptions of Harm.

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in e-cigarette uptake and harm perceptions about e-cigarettes among adults who smoke cigarettes in the U.S.

METHODS

Five waves of the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-2019) were used to assess transitions from exclusive cigarette smoking to (1) exclusive e-cigarette use, (2) dual use, and (3) nonuse of either product (N=7,172). Analyses (conducted in 2022) estimated differences in transitions and e-cigarette harm perceptions by race/ethnicity, income, and education.

RESULTS

Hispanic (OR=0.32; 95% CI=0.18, 0.54) and Black (OR=0.38; 95% CI=0.22, 0.65) adults were less likely than White adults to transition from exclusive cigarette to exclusive e-cigarette use after 1 year. Adults with a bachelor's degree (versus those with less than high school) (OR=2.57; 95% CI=1.49, 4.45) and adults making ≥$100,000/year (versus those making <$10,000) (OR=3.61; 95% CI=2.10, 6.22) were more likely to transition from exclusive cigarette to exclusive e-cigarette use. Hispanic and Black adults and those with lower income and education were more likely to perceive e-cigarettes as equally or more harmful than cigarettes, which in turn was associated with lower odds of transitioning from exclusive cigarette smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use (OR=0.62; 95% CI=0.47, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults who were Hispanic, were Black, and/or had lower SES were less likely to use e-cigarettes to quit cigarettes. Findings provide preliminary evidence that differences in harm perceptions may contribute to disparities in e-cigarette transitions.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估美国成年吸烟者在社会经济和种族/民族方面,在电子烟使用和电子烟危害认知方面的差异。

方法

使用美国人口烟草与健康评估研究(2013-2019 年)的五个波次来评估从单纯吸烟向以下三种情况的转变:(1)单纯电子烟使用,(2)同时使用电子烟和香烟,以及(3)既不使用电子烟也不使用香烟(N=7172)。分析(于 2022 年进行)估计了种族/民族、收入和教育水平差异对电子烟使用和电子烟危害认知的影响。

结果

与白人成年人相比,西班牙裔(OR=0.32;95% CI=0.18,0.54)和黑人(OR=0.38;95% CI=0.22,0.65)成年人在 1 年内从单纯吸烟向单纯电子烟使用的转变可能性较小。拥有学士学位(而非低于高中学历)的成年人(OR=2.57;95% CI=1.49,4.45)和收入≥10 万美元/年(而非收入<1 万美元)的成年人(OR=3.61;95% CI=2.10,6.22)更有可能从单纯吸烟向单纯电子烟使用转变。西班牙裔和黑人成年人以及收入和教育水平较低的成年人更可能认为电子烟与香烟同样有害或更有害,这反过来又与从单纯吸烟向单纯电子烟使用转变的可能性降低相关(OR=0.62;95% CI=0.47,0.81)。

结论

西班牙裔、黑人以及社会经济地位较低的成年人不太可能使用电子烟来戒烟。这些发现初步表明,危害认知的差异可能导致电子烟使用的差异。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake and Perceptions of Harm.电子烟使用和危害认知的社会人口学差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):356-365. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
9
Balancing Consideration of the Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes.权衡电子烟的风险和益处。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Sep;111(9):1661-1672. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306416. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验