Hare-Duke Laurie, Charles Ashleigh, Slade Mike, Rennick-Egglestone Stefan, Dys Ada, Bijdevaate Daan
School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nord University, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Health and Community Participation Devision, Namsos, Norway.
J Recovery Ment Health. 2023 Jan 6;6(1):38-44. doi: 10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38556.
To identify design features of the CHIME conceptual framework of mental health recovery which are associated with high rates of citation.
Systematic review of all citations of the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment (CHIME) framework of mental health recovery. Papers citing CHIME were screened and extracted from three citation databases. Citation content analysis was used to investigate associations between nine CHIME design features. Citations were investigated across six forms of visibility: all citations; Anglophone vs non-Anglophone; academic vs non-academic; academic discipline; professional group; and clinical population.
There were 915 eligible documents identified. Six CHIME framework design features met predefined thresholds for high levels of influence: (i) using a systematic review methodology for development, (ii) adopting a memorable acronym, (iii) having disaggregable components, and being unaligned to a (iv) particular discipline (i.e., transdisciplinary), (v) professional group, or (vi) diagnostic population. Documents from Anglophone countries were more likely to cite CHIME with reference to trans-professional (χ2=3.96, df=1, p=0.05) and ethnicity sub-group analysis (p=0.039) design features than non-Anglophone documents. Non-academic documents were more likely to cite the acronym design feature than academic papers (χ2=5.73, df=1, p=0.01). Public Health-related publications were more likely to cite CHIME within a trans-diagnostic framework (χ2=16.39, df=1, p<0.001) than other disciplines.
The influence and impact of conceptual frameworks for recovery are increased when the framework is underpinned by a systematic review, includes disaggregable components which can be summarized using a memorable acronym, and when the framework is transdisciplinary, trans-professional, and trans-diagnostic.
确定心理健康康复的CHIME概念框架中与高引用率相关的设计特征。
对心理健康康复的“联系、希望、身份、意义和赋权”（CHIME）框架的所有引用进行系统综述。从三个引文数据库中筛选并提取引用CHIME的论文。采用引文内容分析法研究CHIME的九个设计特征之间的关联。在六种可见性形式中对引文进行研究：所有引文；英语国家与非英语国家；学术与非学术；学术学科；专业群体；以及临床人群。
共识别出915份符合条件的文献。CHIME框架的六个设计特征达到了高影响力的预定义阈值：（i）使用系统综述方法进行开发，（ii）采用易记首字母缩写词，（iii）具有可分解的组成部分，且与（iv）特定学科（即跨学科）、（v）专业群体或（vi）诊断人群不相关。与非英语国家的文献相比，来自英语国家的文献更有可能在引用CHIME时提及跨专业（χ2 = 3.96，自由度 = 1，p = 0.05）和种族亚组分析（p = 0.039）设计特征。非学术文献比学术论文更有可能引用首字母缩写词设计特征（χ2 = 5.73，自由度 = 1，p = 0.01）。与其他学科相比，公共卫生相关出版物更有可能在跨诊断框架内引用CHIME（χ2 = 16.39，自由度 = 1，p < 0.001）。
当概念框架以系统综述为基础，包括可用易记首字母缩写词概括且可分解的组成部分，并且框架是跨学科、跨专业和跨诊断时，康复概念框架的影响力和影响会增加。
