Developmental Disorders Program, Center of Biological Science and Health, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento e Centro Mackenzie de Pesquisa sobre a Infância e Adolescência- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (UPM), São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 17;18(3):e0273891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273891. eCollection 2023.
Interventions that combine cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with unconditional cash transfers (UCT) reduce the risk of antisocial behavior (ASB), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this paper, we test the role of psychological and cognitive mechanisms in explaining this effect. We assessed the mediating role of executive function, self-control, and time preferences.
We used data from the Sustainable Transformation of Youth in Liberia, a community-based randomized controlled trial of criminally engaged men. The men were randomized into: Group-1: control (n = 237); and Group-2: CBT+UCT (n = 207). ASB was measured 12-13 months after the interventions were completed, and the following mediators were assessed 2-5 weeks later: (i) self-control, (ii) time preferences and (iii) executive functions. We estimated the natural direct effect (NDE) and the natural indirect effect (NIE) of the intervention over ASB.
Self-control, time preferences and a weighted index of all three mediators were associated with ASB scores, but the intervention influenced time preferences only [B = 0.09 95%CI (0.03; 0.15)]. There was no evidence that the effect of the intervention on ASB was mediated by self-control [BNIE = 0.007 95%CI (-0.01; 0.02)], time preferences [BNIE = -0.02 95%CI (-0.05; 0.01)], executive functions [BNIE = 0.002 95%CI (-0.002; 0.006)] or the weighted index of the mediators [BNIE = -0.0005 95%CI (-0.03; 0.02)].
UCT and CBT lead to improvements in ASB, even in the absence of mediation via psychological and cognitive functions. Findings suggest that the causal mechanisms may involve non-psychological pathways.
将认知行为疗法(CBT)与无条件现金转移(UCT)相结合的干预措施可降低反社会行为(ASB)的风险,但潜在机制尚不清楚。在本文中,我们测试了解释这种效果的心理和认知机制的作用。我们评估了执行功能、自我控制和时间偏好的中介作用。
我们使用来自利比里亚青年可持续转型的社区为基础的随机对照试验的数据,该试验涉及有犯罪行为的男性。男性被随机分为:第 1 组:对照组(n = 237);和第 2 组:CBT+UCT(n = 207)。在干预措施完成后 12-13 个月测量 ASB,并且在 2-5 周后评估以下中介物:(i)自我控制,(ii)时间偏好和(iii)执行功能。我们估计了干预对 ASB 的自然直接效应(NDE)和自然间接效应(NIE)。
自我控制、时间偏好和所有三个中介物的加权指数均与 ASB 评分相关,但干预仅影响时间偏好[B = 0.09,95%CI(0.03;0.15)]。没有证据表明干预对 ASB 的影响是通过自我控制[BNIE = 0.007,95%CI(-0.01;0.02)]、时间偏好[BNIE = -0.02,95%CI(-0.05;0.01)]、执行功能[BNIE = 0.002,95%CI(-0.002;0.006)]或中介物的加权指数[BNIE = -0.0005,95%CI(-0.03;0.02)]来介导。
UCT 和 CBT 可改善 ASB,即使在没有通过心理和认知功能进行中介的情况下也是如此。研究结果表明,因果机制可能涉及非心理途径。