Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 3Z6, Canada.
Alberta Ministry of Health, 10025 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5J 1S6, Canada.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 17;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0801-1.
The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature on the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and influenza immunization and to examine how certain measures of SES may influence interpretations of this relationship.
We conducted a systematic review of existing peer-reviewed literature to evaluate the above relationship in the general population. Electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from January 2012 to May 2017 to identify English-language studies relevant to this review. Studies were included where influenza vaccination was explicitly reported as the dependent variable and SES as the independent variable. We limited our review to measures of SES that focus on education, income, social class, occupation, and deprivation. Studies that measured SES using other variables (e.g., race, ethnicity, geographic location, rural or urban status, or insurance status) were excluded. Studies were also excluded if they did not report on the human population or did not analyze original data. The population of interest included all age groups, levels of health status, and sociodemographic backgrounds. The review was also limited to World Bank high-income countries. Two authors independently screened full-text articles after obtaining a Kappa score of K = 0.867. The methodological quality of manuscripts was assessed using the appraisal tools developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results were qualitatively reported and synthesized.
Of the 42 articles included in this review, 52.4% (n = 22) found that higher levels of SES resulted in higher levels of influenza vaccination; 4.5% (n = 2) reported a negative association; and 14.3% (n = 6) found no association. Just over a quarter (26.2%, n = 12) of articles reported mixed results.
There was consistently a relationship between SES and influenza immunization, which varied according to how SES was measured. It is recommended that authors be explicit in defining the SES concept they are trying to capture and that they utilize multiple measures of SES (e.g., education, income, class).
本文旨在系统回顾社会经济地位(SES)与流感免疫接种之间关系的文献,并探讨某些 SES 衡量指标如何影响对这一关系的解释。
我们对现有同行评议文献进行了系统回顾,以评估一般人群中上述关系。从 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月,我们通过电子数据库(MEDLINE 和 EMBASE)检索了与本综述相关的英文研究。如果流感疫苗接种明确报告为因变量,SES 为自变量,则将研究纳入。我们将综述限于关注教育、收入、社会阶层、职业和贫困的 SES 衡量指标。使用其他变量(如种族、民族、地理位置、农村或城市状况或保险状况)衡量 SES 的研究被排除在外。如果研究未报告人类群体或未分析原始数据,也将其排除在外。感兴趣的人群包括所有年龄组、健康状况水平和社会人口背景。该综述还限于世界银行高收入国家。在获得 Kappa 得分 K=0.867 后,两名作者独立筛选全文文章。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所开发的评估工具评估手稿的方法学质量。结果以定性报告和综合形式报告。
在本综述中纳入的 42 篇文章中,有 52.4%(n=22)发现 SES 水平较高与流感疫苗接种率较高有关;4.5%(n=2)报告了负相关;14.3%(n=6)发现没有关联。超过四分之一(26.2%,n=12)的文章报告了混合结果。
SES 与流感免疫接种之间始终存在关联,具体取决于 SES 的衡量方式。建议作者明确说明他们试图捕捉的 SES 概念,并利用 SES 的多个衡量指标(例如,教育、收入、阶层)。