• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般健康问卷中文版的信度和因子结构

Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire.

作者信息

Shek D T

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1987 Nov;43(6):683-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198711)43:6<683::aid-jclp2270430606>3.0.co;2-b.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198711)43:6<683::aid-jclp2270430606>3.0.co;2-b
PMID:3693557
Abstract

The Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was administered to 2,150 Chinese secondary school students. The GHQ was found to have high internal consistency as a scale and high item-total correlations for most of the items. Factor analysis with a five-factor solution showed that five factors were abstracted from the scale, namely, anxiety, depression, inadequate coping, interpersonal dysfunctioning, and sleep disturbances. By randomly splitting the total sample into two subsamples, these five factors could be reproduced reliably, and high coefficients of congruence were found. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the GHQ and the implications of the findings were discussed.

摘要

我们对2150名中国中学生进行了一般健康问卷(GHQ)中文版的测试。结果发现,GHQ作为一个量表具有较高的内部一致性,且大多数项目的项目与总分相关性也很高。采用五因素解决方案进行的因素分析表明,该量表提炼出了五个因素,即焦虑、抑郁、应对不足、人际功能失调和睡眠障碍。通过将总样本随机分为两个子样本,这五个因素能够被可靠地重现,并且发现了较高的一致性系数。本文还讨论了GHQ中文版的心理测量特性以及研究结果的意义。

相似文献

1
Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire.一般健康问卷中文版的信度和因子结构
J Clin Psychol. 1987 Nov;43(6):683-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198711)43:6<683::aid-jclp2270430606>3.0.co;2-b.
2
Validity of the Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire.中文版一般健康问卷的效度
J Clin Psychol. 1989 Nov;45(6):890-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198911)45:6<890::aid-jclp2270450610>3.0.co;2-g.
3
Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory.中文版贝克抑郁量表的信度与因子结构
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Jan;46(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199001)46:1<35::aid-jclp2270460106>3.0.co;2-w.
4
Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the Purpose in Life Questionnaire.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):384-92. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<384::aid-jclp2270440312>3.0.co;2-1.
5
What does the Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory measure in Chinese students--general psychopathology or depression?中文版贝克抑郁量表在中国学生中测量的是什么——一般精神病理学还是抑郁症?
J Clin Psychol. 1991 May;47(3):381-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199105)47:3<381::aid-jclp2270470309>3.0.co;2-d.
6
Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population.一般健康问卷(GHQ - 28)简化版在西班牙人群中的效度。
Psychol Med. 1986 Feb;16(1):135-40. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700002579.
7
Comparison of the General Health Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.一般健康问卷与医院焦虑抑郁量表的比较
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:860-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.860.
8
Validity of the GHQ-28 in New Zealand women.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1989 Jun;23(2):187-96. doi: 10.3109/00048678909062135.
9
The validity of the French version of the GHQ-28 and PSYDIS in a community sample of 20 year olds in Switzerland.法国版GHQ - 28和PSYDIS在瑞士20岁社区样本中的效度。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1989;238(3):161-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00451005.
10
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.土耳其版患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index among frontline COVID-19 health care workers using classical test theory and item response theory.采用经典测试理论和项目反应理论评估一线 COVID-19 医护人员匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度和效度。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Feb 1;18(2):541-551. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9658.
2
Association Between Anxiety and Depression and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.焦虑、抑郁与非酒精性脂肪性肝病之间的关联
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 18;7:585618. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.585618. eCollection 2020.
3
Factor Structures of General Health Questionnaire-12 Within the Number of Kins Among the Rural Residents in China.
中国农村居民亲属数量范围内一般健康问卷-12的因子结构
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 2;10:1774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01774. eCollection 2019.
4
Mental Health among Migrants in Shenzhen, China: Does it Matter Whether the Migrant Population is Identified by Hukou or Birthplace?中国深圳移民的心理健康:以户口还是出生地来识别移民人口重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 27;15(12):2671. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122671.
5
Measuring the effects of socioeconomic factors on mental health among migrants in urban China: a multiple indicators multiple causes model.衡量社会经济因素对中国城市移民心理健康的影响:多指标多原因模型
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jan 6;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0118-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Calligraphy and meditation for stress reduction: an experimental comparison.书法与冥想减压效果的实验比较
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Feb 13;7:47-52. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S55743. eCollection 2014.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis of the stagnation scale--a traditional Chinese medicine construct operationalized for mental health practice.停滞量表的验证性因子分析——一种为心理健康实践而操作的中医构建。
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;19(2):228-33. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9146-9.
8
Impact of life events and difficulties on the mental health of Chinese immigrant women.生活事件和困难对中国移民女性心理健康的影响。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2007 Oct;9(4):281-90. doi: 10.1007/s10903-007-9042-1.
9
A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research.跨文化研究中特定维度的健康相关生活质量测量方法的批判性综述。
Qual Life Res. 1993 Dec;2(6):397-432. doi: 10.1007/BF00422216.
10
The factor structure of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire when used in Japanese early adolescents and adult employees: age- and cross-cultural comparisons.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1992;242(2-3):172-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02191565.