Suppr超能文献

过度自信效应与学习动机对基础生命支持的更新作用:一项观察性问卷调查研究

Overconfidence effects and learning motivation refreshing BLS: An observational questionnaire study.

作者信息

Bushuven Stefan, Bansbach Joachim, Bentele Michael, Trifunovic-Koenig Milena, Bentele Stefanie, Gerber Bianka, Hagen Fritz, Friess Christian, Fischer Martin R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2023 Mar 8;14:100369. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100369. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

Regular refresher skill courses are necessary to maintain competence in basic life support. The utilization of these training programs strongly depends on the motivation to learn. Learning motivation may be affected by overconfidence and clinical tribalism, as they both imply a higher competence compared to others, and therefore, a lower demand for training. This study aimed to assess how overconfidence in basic life support competencies affects learning motivation.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter, anonymous online questionnaire survey using validated psychometric tests for healthcare professionals in Germany. Further, we tested participants' knowledge and attitude regarding international basic life support guidelines. The study was conducted between March and April 2022, and healthcare providers from 22 German emergency medical services and hospitals at all levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 2,000 healthcare professionals assessed, 407 completed the assessment (response rate, 20.4%). We confirmed the presence of overconfidence and clinical tribalism (identity differentiation between social groups) among the 407 physicians, nurses, and emergency medical service providers who completed the survey. Three different learning-motivation groups emerged from cluster analysis: "experts" (confident and motivated), "recruitables" (overconfident and motivated), and "unawares" (overconfident and unmotivated). The three groups were present in all professional groups, independent of the frequency of exposure to cardiac arrest and educational level.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed the presence of overconfidence effects and different learning motivation types in individuals learning basic life support, even in instructors.

摘要

研究目的

定期的复习技能课程对于维持基本生命支持能力是必要的。这些培训项目的利用率很大程度上取决于学习动机。学习动机可能会受到过度自信和临床部落主义的影响,因为这两者都意味着比其他人有更高的能力,因此对培训的需求较低。本研究旨在评估对基本生命支持能力的过度自信如何影响学习动机。

方法

我们对德国的医疗保健专业人员进行了一项横断面、观察性、多中心、匿名在线问卷调查,使用经过验证的心理测量测试。此外,我们测试了参与者对国际基本生命支持指南的知识和态度。该研究于2022年3月至4月进行,对来自德国22个紧急医疗服务机构和各级医院的医疗服务提供者进行了评估。

结果

在评估的2000名医疗保健专业人员中,407人完成了评估(回复率为20.4%)。我们在完成调查的407名医生、护士和紧急医疗服务提供者中证实了过度自信和临床部落主义(社会群体之间的身份差异)的存在。聚类分析产生了三个不同的学习动机组:“专家”(自信且有动力)、“可招募者”(过度自信且有动力)和“不知情者”(过度自信且无动力)。这三个组在所有专业群体中都存在,与心脏骤停暴露频率和教育水平无关。

结论

这些发现表明,即使在教员中,学习基本生命支持的个体也存在过度自信效应和不同的学习动机类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9423/10020094/a61cf0f598df/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验