COVID-19 Vaccines and Epidemiology Division, UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Field Service, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Mar 20;151:e58. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000420.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) rapidly replaced Delta (B.1.617.2) to become dominant in England. Our study assessed differences in transmission between Omicron and Delta using two independent data sources and methods. Omicron and Delta cases were identified through genomic sequencing, genotyping and S-gene target failure in England from 5-11 December 2021. Secondary attack rates for named contacts were calculated in household and non-household settings using contact tracing data, while household clustering was identified using national surveillance data. Logistic regression models were applied to control for factors associated with transmission for both methods. For contact tracing data, higher secondary attack rates for Omicron Delta were identified in households (15.0% 10.8%) and non-households (8.2% 3.7%). For both variants, in household settings, onward transmission was reduced from cases and named contacts who had three doses of vaccine compared to two, but this effect was less pronounced for Omicron (adjusted risk ratio, aRR 0.78 and 0.88) than Delta (aRR 0.62 and 0.68). In non-household settings, a similar reduction was observed only in contacts who had three doses two doses for both Delta (aRR 0.51) and Omicron (aRR 0.76). For national surveillance data, the risk of household clustering, was increased 3.5-fold for Omicron compared to Delta (aRR 3.54 (3.29-3.81)). Our study identified increased risk of onward transmission of Omicron, consistent with its successful global displacement of Delta. We identified a reduced effectiveness of vaccination in lowering risk of transmission, a likely contributor for the rapid propagation of Omicron.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎变异株(B.1.1.529)迅速取代德尔塔(B.1.617.2)成为英国的主要流行株。我们的研究使用两种独立的数据来源和方法评估了奥密克戎和德尔塔之间的传播差异。奥密克戎和德尔塔病例通过基因组测序、基因分型和英格兰 2021 年 12 月 5 日至 11 日的 S 基因靶标失败来识别。通过接触者追踪数据,在家庭和非家庭环境中计算了已知接触者的二级攻击率,而家庭聚集使用国家监测数据来识别。应用逻辑回归模型来控制两种方法与传播相关的因素。对于接触者追踪数据,奥密克戎的二级攻击率 德尔塔在家庭(15.0% 10.8%)和非家庭(8.2% 3.7%)中更高。对于两种变异株,在家庭环境中,与接种两剂疫苗的病例和已知接触者相比,接种三剂疫苗的病例和已知接触者的传播率降低,但奥密克戎的这种影响(调整后的风险比,aRR 0.78 和 0.88)不如德尔塔(aRR 0.62 和 0.68)明显。在非家庭环境中,只有在接触者接种三剂 两剂疫苗的情况下,才观察到类似的减少,无论是德尔塔(aRR 0.51)还是奥密克戎(aRR 0.76)。对于国家监测数据,与德尔塔相比,奥密克戎家庭聚集的风险增加了 3.5 倍(aRR 3.54(3.29-3.81))。我们的研究表明,奥密克戎的传播风险增加,这与其成功在全球取代德尔塔相一致。我们发现疫苗接种降低传播风险的效果降低,这可能是奥密克戎迅速传播的一个原因。