• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童人工耳蜗患者导向在线资源的质量和可读性的定性评估。

Qualitative Assessment of Quality and Readability of Patient-Directed Online Resources for Cochlear Implants in Children.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul;169(1):143-150. doi: 10.1002/ohn.251. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/ohn.251
PMID:36939594
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Children with sensorineural hearing loss can benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). Patients can obtain direct access to medical information on the internet. However, the internet is uncontrolled, and the quality and readability of information are unpredictable. The quality and readability of websites providing information about CI in children were assessed in this study.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Online search.

METHODS

The 3 most popular search engines (Google, Bing, and Yahoo) were queried with the phrases "cochlear implant" and "cochlear implant in children." The DISCERN instrument was used to assess the information quality. The readability was evaluated using 5 validated readability indices.

RESULTS

Of 103 websites, the median DISCERN quality score was 33 (interquartile range [IQR], 27-41). Only 5 websites were considered to be of good quality, and 1 was excellent. The median readability school grade was 11th (IQR, 10-12), which fell within the range defined as difficult. No website was at or below the recommended sixth-grade level. There was no correlation between readability and the DISCERN scores (r = -0.105, p = .291).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that most websites with information on CI for children are of variable quality and are written beyond the reading ability of the general population. Website builders should focus on improving the readability of their online material to help the average reader understand and benefit from the content.

摘要

目的

患有感音神经性听力损失的儿童可以从人工耳蜗植入(CI)中受益。患者可以直接在互联网上获取医疗信息。然而,互联网是不受控制的,信息的质量和可读性是不可预测的。本研究评估了提供儿童人工耳蜗植入信息的网站的质量和可读性。

研究设计

横断面研究。

设置

在线搜索。

方法

用短语“人工耳蜗植入”和“儿童人工耳蜗植入”在 3 个最受欢迎的搜索引擎(谷歌、必应和雅虎)上进行查询。使用 DISCERN 工具评估信息质量。使用 5 种经过验证的可读性指标评估可读性。

结果

在 103 个网站中,DISCERN 质量评分中位数为 33(四分位距[IQR],27-41)。只有 5 个网站被认为是高质量的,1 个是优秀的。中位数阅读水平为 11 年级(IQR,10-12),属于较难水平。没有一个网站达到或低于建议的 6 年级水平。可读性和 DISCERN 评分之间没有相关性(r=−0.105,p=0.291)。

结论

我们的研究表明,大多数提供儿童人工耳蜗植入信息的网站质量参差不齐,且超出了普通读者的阅读能力。网站建设者应专注于提高其在线材料的可读性,以帮助普通读者理解和受益于内容。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Assessment of Quality and Readability of Patient-Directed Online Resources for Cochlear Implants in Children.儿童人工耳蜗患者导向在线资源的质量和可读性的定性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul;169(1):143-150. doi: 10.1002/ohn.251. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Readability and Quality of English and Spanish Online Health Information about Cochlear Implants.关于人工耳蜗的英文和西班牙文在线健康信息的可读性和质量。
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):223-228. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003791. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
3
Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.胸廓出口综合征患者在线资源的质量评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.在线子宫切除术患者信息:系统环境扫描质量和可读性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Aug;44(8):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Thematic coverage and readability of online patient information on cochlear implant care.关于人工耳蜗护理的在线患者信息的主题覆盖范围和可读性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4727-4734. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08694-x. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.家长们正在阅读的关于喉软化症的内容:喉软化症网络资源的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;108:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.扁桃体切除术和睡眠呼吸暂停患者信息网站的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;98:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
10
Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.人工耳蜗植入:针对患者的网络信息质量与可读性评估
Cochlear Implants Int. 2015;16(6):321-5. doi: 10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000015. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative Assessment of Quality and Readability of Patient-Directed Arabic Online Resources for Cochlear Implants in Children.儿童人工耳蜗植入患者导向阿拉伯语在线资源的质量和可读性的定性评估
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul 1;29(2):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1804516. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
What Do People Want to Know About Cochlear Implants: A Google Analytic Study.人们想了解关于人工耳蜗的哪些方面:一项谷歌分析研究。
Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):840-847. doi: 10.1002/lary.31741. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Thematic coverage and readability of online patient information on cochlear implant care.
关于人工耳蜗护理的在线患者信息的主题覆盖范围和可读性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4727-4734. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08694-x. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
Translation and Validation of the Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life (HEAR-QL) Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents in Arabic.《儿童和青少年听力环境与生活质量问卷(HEAR-QL)》阿拉伯语版的翻译与验证
Cureus. 2023 May 12;15(5):e38936. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38936. eCollection 2023 May.
5
The Hearing Aid Effect in the 2020s: Where Do We Stand?21世纪20年代的助听器效果:我们处于什么位置?
Cureus. 2023 Apr 29;15(4):e38302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38302. eCollection 2023 Apr.