National University of Distance Education.
Hist Psychol. 2023 Aug;26(3):247-273. doi: 10.1037/hop0000234. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
In this article, we look into the development of the Helmholtz theory of perception in the light of Spanish biologist Ramón Turró's objectivist critique of the theory. In the first part, we explain the decisive role that Helmholtz's theory of perception played in the evolution of his own general philosophical stance. Through the work of Helmholtz, we show how the dialectic between philosophical surmises and models of perception was an ongoing, fundamental part of the period that saw the formation of scientific psychology. In the second part of the article, we examine Turró's original, unique contribution to the discourse. Early on in his theoretical work, Turró defended a model of perception closely resembling Helmholtz's, but, because of his objectivist philosophical convictions, Turró eventually elaborated an original theory of perception based largely on the trophic experience. His proposal rested on his own research as a physiologist and featured the elimination of all mentalistic components, in contrast to the voluntaristic leanings he detected in Helmholtz's work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
本文旨在从西班牙生物学家拉蒙·图罗（Ramón Turró）对该理论的客观主义批判的角度，探讨赫尔姆霍茨知觉理论的发展。在第一部分，我们解释了知觉理论在赫尔姆霍茨自身哲学立场演变中所起的决定性作用。通过赫尔姆霍茨的著作，我们展示了哲学假设和知觉模型之间的辩证关系是科学心理学形成时期的一个持续的、基本的组成部分。在文章的第二部分，我们考察了图罗对这一话语的原创独特贡献。在他的理论工作早期，图罗捍卫了一种与赫尔姆霍茨的知觉模型非常相似的模型，但由于他的客观主义哲学信念，图罗最终基于营养经验，提出了一种以消除所有心理主义成分为基础的原创知觉理论，与他在赫尔姆霍茨作品中发现的意志主义倾向形成鲜明对比。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2023 APA，保留所有权利）。
