Otaki Farah, Gholami Mandana, Fawad Iman, Akbar Anjum, Banerjee Yajnavalka
College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Strategy and Institutional Excellence, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 20;12:e41626. doi: 10.2196/41626.
In competency-based medical education (CBME), "Assessment for learning" or "Formative Assessment" (FA) plays a key role in augmenting student learning. FAs help students to measure their progress over time, enabling them to proactively improve their performance in summative assessments. FAs also encourage students to learn in a way where they address their knowledge gaps and gaps in their conceptualization of the subject matter. The effectiveness of an FA, as a learning and development instrument, relies on the degree of student involvement in the corresponding educational intervention's design and implementation. The extent of students' engagement in FA can be evaluated by appraising their perception regarding the educational intervention itself.
This proof-of-concept study aims to develop a systemic understanding of a Formative Assessment as an Instructional Tool (FAIS) implemented in a biochemistry course in the Basic Medical Sciences component of an undergraduate entry, CBME.
The educational intervention in question is an FAIS, which is implemented in a biochemistry course in the first semester of a 6-year bachelor of medicine, bachelor of surgery program. When developing the FAIS, each area of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were considered. Assessment formats are developed per Miller's learning pyramid. This multiphase study is meant to rely on a convergent mixed methods design, where qualitative and quantitative data are independently collected and analyzed. Thereafter, the outputs of analyses are systematically merged using joint display analysis process. Qualitative data are collected through a focus group session that captures the students' perception toward the FAIS. Data collection, integral to this focus group session, is exploratory. The inductive qualitative data analysis follows Braun and Clarke's 6-step framework. The quantitative component of this study revolves around investigating the effect of the FAIS on the course's summative assessment. The summative assessment performance of the 71 students, enrolled in the FAIS cohort, will be compared to that of the students in the non-FAIS cohort. The total duration of the proposed multiphase research study is 6 months.
This proposed multiphase study is expected to showcase, from a systemic perspective, the effectiveness of the respective educational intervention. It will shed light on the participating students' attitudes in relation to the usefulness of FA in achieving competency goals and in fostering self-directed learning. The proposed study could also uncover the hypothesized association between the FA intervention and enhanced performance in summative assessments.
Our findings will generate evidence regarding the application of FAs, which can be leveraged by other medical educators in contexts similar to those under investigation.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/41626.
在基于能力的医学教育(CBME)中,“为学习而评估”或“形成性评估”(FA)在促进学生学习方面发挥着关键作用。形成性评估有助于学生衡量自己随时间的进步,使他们能够积极提高在终结性评估中的表现。形成性评估还鼓励学生以弥补知识差距和学科概念化差距的方式进行学习。作为一种学习和发展工具,形成性评估的有效性取决于学生参与相应教育干预设计和实施的程度。可以通过评估学生对教育干预本身的看法来评估学生参与形成性评估的程度。
本概念验证研究旨在系统地理解在本科入学CBME基础医学课程的生物化学课程中实施的作为教学工具的形成性评估(FAIS)。
所讨论的教育干预是一种FAIS,在6年制医学学士、外科学士课程第一学期的生物化学课程中实施。在开发FAIS时,考虑了知识、技能和态度的各个领域。根据米勒学习金字塔开发评估形式。这项多阶段研究旨在采用收敛性混合方法设计,独立收集和分析定性和定量数据。此后,使用联合展示分析过程系统地合并分析结果。通过焦点小组会议收集定性数据,该会议捕捉学生对FAIS的看法。作为该焦点小组会议不可或缺的一部分,数据收集具有探索性。归纳定性数据分析遵循布劳恩和克拉克的六步框架。本研究的定量部分围绕调查FAIS对课程终结性评估的影响展开。将比较参加FAIS组的71名学生与未参加FAIS组的学生在终结性评估中的表现。拟议的多阶段研究的总时长为6个月。
拟议的多阶段研究有望从系统的角度展示相应教育干预的有效性。它将揭示参与研究的学生对形成性评估在实现能力目标和促进自主学习方面的有用性的态度。拟议的研究还可能揭示形成性评估干预与终结性评估中表现提高之间的假设关联。
我们的研究结果将产生关于形成性评估应用的证据,其他医学教育工作者在与本研究类似的背景下可以利用这些证据。
国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/41626。