Suppr超能文献

人类接触多氟和全氟烷基物质(PFAS)的室内介质途径:系统评价。

Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107149. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107149. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has been primarily attributed to contaminated food and drinking water. There is information indicating other sources and pathways of exposure in residential environments, but few studies report relationships between these indoor media and human biomonitoring measurements.

METHODS

This study adapts existing systematic review tools and methodologies to synthesize evidence for PFAS exposure pathways from indoor environment media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, and indoor air and dust. Studies were identified using innovative machine learning approaches and pathway-specific search strings to reduce time needed for literature search and screening. The included studies and systematic review were evaluated using tools modified specifically for exposure studies. The systematic review was conducted following a previously published protocol (DeLuca et al., 2021) that describes the systematic review methodology used in detail.

RESULTS

Only 7 studies were identified that measured the targeted subset of 8 PFAS chemicals in concordant household media (primarily house dust) and participant serum. Data extracted from the included studies were used to calculate exposure intake rates and estimate a percentage of occupant serum concentrations that could be attributed to the indoor exposure pathways. These calculations showed that exposure to PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and PFHxS from contaminated house dust could account for 13%, 3%, 7%, and 25% of serum concentrations, respectively. Inhalation of PFAS in indoor air could account for less than 4% of serum PFOA concentrations and less than 2% of serum PFOS and PFNA concentrations. A risk of bias was identified due to participant profiles in most of the studies being skewed towards white, female, and higher socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with synthesizing evidence for estimated contributions to serum PFAS levels from indoor exposure media, this systematic review also identifies a consistent risk of bias across exposure study populations that should be considered in future studies. It highlights a major research gap and need for studies that measure concordant data from both indoor exposure media and participant serum and the need for continued research on exposure modeling parameters for many PFAS chemicals.

摘要

背景

人类接触全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)主要归因于受污染的食物和饮用水。有信息表明,在居住环境中存在其他来源和暴露途径,但很少有研究报告这些室内介质与人体生物监测测量值之间的关系。

方法

本研究采用现有的系统评价工具和方法,综合来自室内环境介质(包括消费品、家用物品、清洁产品、个人护理产品以及室内空气和灰尘)的 PFAS 暴露途径的证据。研究使用创新的机器学习方法和特定途径的搜索字符串进行识别,以减少文献搜索和筛选所需的时间。所纳入的研究和系统评价使用专门为暴露研究修改的工具进行评估。该系统评价遵循之前发表的方案(DeLuca 等人,2021 年)进行,该方案详细描述了系统评价方法。

结果

仅确定了 7 项研究,这些研究测量了 8 种 PFAS 化学物质在一致的家庭介质(主要是室内灰尘)和参与者血清中的目标子集。从纳入的研究中提取的数据用于计算暴露摄入量并估计室内暴露途径可归因于参与者血清浓度的百分比。这些计算表明,从受污染的室内灰尘中接触 PFOA、PFOS、PFNA 和 PFHxS 分别可占血清浓度的 13%、3%、7%和 25%。室内空气中 PFAS 的吸入量分别占血清 PFOA 浓度的不到 4%、血清 PFOS 和 PFNA 浓度的不到 2%。由于大多数研究中的参与者概况偏向于白人、女性和较高的社会经济地位,因此存在偏倚风险。

结论

除了综合来自室内暴露介质对血清 PFAS 水平的估计贡献的证据外,本系统评价还确定了暴露研究人群中一致的偏倚风险,这在未来的研究中应予以考虑。它突出了一个主要的研究差距和需要,需要进行同时测量室内暴露介质和参与者血清中一致数据的研究,以及需要继续研究许多 PFAS 化学物质的暴露建模参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e6/11577573/3b84e9957a00/nihms-2030010-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验