Suppr超能文献

人体接触多氟和全氟烷基物质(PFAS)的室内介质途径:系统评价方案

Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review protocol.

机构信息

US EPA, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

US EPA, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106308. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106308. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has been primarily attributed to contaminated food and drinking water. However, additional PFAS exposure pathways have been raised by a limited number of studies reporting correlations between commercial and industrial products and PFAS levels in human media and biomonitoring. Systematic review (SR) methodologies have been widely used to evaluate similar questions using an unbiased approach in the fields of clinical medicine, epidemiology, and toxicology, but the deployment in exposure science is ongoing. Here we present a systematic review protocol that adapts existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools to exposure science studies in order to investigate evidence for important PFAS exposure pathways from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust.

OBJECTIVES

We will systematically review exposure science studies that present both PFAS concentrations from indoor exposure media and PFAS concentrations in blood serum or plasma. Exposure estimates will be synthesized from the evidence to answer the question, "For the general population, what effect does exposure from PFAS chemicals via indoor media have on blood, serum or plasma concentrations of PFAS?" We adapt existing systematic review methodologies and study evaluation tools from the U.S. EPA's Systematic Review Protocol for the PFBA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFNA, and PFDA IRIS Assessments and the Navigation Guide for exposure science studies, as well as present innovative developments of exposure pathway-specific search strings for use in artificial intelligence screening software.

DATA SOURCES

We will search electronic databases for potentially relevant literature, including Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest. Literature search results will be stored in EPA's Health and Environmental Research Online (HERO) database.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA

Included studies will present exposure measures from indoor media including consumer products, household articles, cleaning products, personal care products, plus indoor air and dust, paired with PFAS concentrations in blood, serum or plasma from adults and/or children in the general population. We focus on a subset of PFAS chemicals including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA).

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Studies will be prefiltered at the title and abstract level using computationally intelligent search strings to expedite the screening process for reviewers. Two independent reviewers will screen the prefiltered studies against inclusion criteria at the title/abstract level and then full-text level, after which the reviewers will assess the studies' risk of bias using an approach modified from established systematic review tools for exposure studies. Exposure estimates will be calculated to investigate the proportion of blood, serum or plasma) PFAS concentrations that can be explained by exposure to PFAS in indoor media.

摘要

背景

人类接触全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)主要归因于受污染的食物和饮用水。然而,少数研究报告商业和工业产品与人体介质和生物监测中 PFAS 水平之间存在相关性,从而提出了其他 PFAS 暴露途径。系统评价(SR)方法已广泛用于评估临床医学、流行病学和毒理学领域的类似问题,采用无偏方法,但在暴露科学中的应用仍在继续。本研究旨在制定系统评价方案,将现有的系统评价方法和研究评估工具应用于暴露科学研究,以调查室内介质(包括消费品、家用物品、清洁产品、个人护理产品以及室内空气和灰尘)中重要 PFAS 暴露途径的证据。

目的

我们将系统地综述既提供室内暴露介质中的 PFAS 浓度又提供血清或血浆中 PFAS 浓度的暴露科学研究。将根据证据综合暴露估计值,以回答以下问题:“对于一般人群,通过室内介质接触 PFAS 化学物质对血液、血清或血浆中 PFAS 的浓度有何影响?”我们将从美国环保署的全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟丁酸(PFBA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)、全氟壬酸(PFNA)和全氟癸酸(PFDA)IRIS 评估的系统评价方案和暴露科学研究导航指南中改编现有的系统评价方法和研究评估工具,并针对特定的暴露途径提出创新性的搜索字符串,用于人工智能筛选软件。

数据来源

我们将在电子数据库中搜索潜在相关文献,包括 Web of Science、PubMed 和 ProQuest。文献搜索结果将存储在美国环保署的健康与环境研究在线(HERO)数据库中。

研究入选和排除标准

纳入的研究将提供室内介质(包括消费品、家用物品、清洁产品、个人护理产品以及室内空气和灰尘)的暴露测量值,并与成年人和/或一般人群中儿童的血液、血清或血浆中的 PFAS 浓度进行配对。我们重点关注 PFAS 化学物质的一个子集,包括全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟丁酸(PFBA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFBS)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)、全氟己酸(PFHxA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)和全氟壬酸(PFNA)。

研究评估和综合方法

研究将在标题和摘要层面使用计算智能搜索字符串进行预过滤,以加快审查员的筛选过程。两名独立的审查员将在标题/摘要层面和全文层面筛选预过滤的研究,然后审查员将使用改编自暴露研究系统评价工具的方法评估研究的偏倚风险。将计算暴露估计值,以调查可归因于室内介质中 PFAS 暴露的血液、血清或血浆)PFAS 浓度的比例。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验