• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[家庭护理安排:审视与社会经济地位相关的支持服务使用情况]

[Homecare arrangements: examining the use of support services in relation to socioeconomic status].

作者信息

Englert Nathalie, Peters Lara, Przysucha Mareike, Noelle Marco, Hülsken-Giesler Manfred, Büscher Andreas

机构信息

Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Hochschule Osnabrück, Caprivistr. 30a, 49076, Osnabrück, Deutschland.

Fachbereich Gesundheit, Fachhochschule Münster, Münster, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):540-549. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03684-6. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-023-03684-6
PMID:36941502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10163119/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National and international findings indicate that homecare arrangements are influenced by socioeconomic factors. Demographic and social developments justify the assumption of an increasing number of people in need of care from resource-pour groups and therefore a continuously increasing importance of home-based long-term care.

OBJECTIVE

It is examined whether income and education of people in need of care and their caregivers are related to the use of support services in homecare arrangements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Quantitative secondary data analysis of a survey among members of the social association VdK (Sozialverband VdK). The statistical evaluation includes descriptive analyses as well as the investigation of correlations between socioeconomic characteristics and characteristics of the care arrangement.

RESULTS

A correlation between income and the use of support services exists regarding so-called 24-hour care, which is more common with high incomes. Other income effects can be seen in the extent to which care services and home help services are used and in measures to adapt the home environment. A higher level of education is related to an increased use of counselling services. The assessment of the care situation is more negative the lower the income.

CONCLUSIONS

The results point out that phenomena of social inequality in care exist and that the options for shaping homecare are influenced by socioeconomic factors. The study also shows challenges in dealing with social inequality and provides orientation for further research, which is becoming increasingly important in view of current trends.

摘要

背景

国内和国际研究结果表明,家庭护理安排受社会经济因素影响。人口结构和社会发展使人们有理由认为,资源匮乏群体中需要护理的人数在增加,因此家庭长期护理的重要性也在不断提高。

目的

研究需要护理者及其照料者的收入和教育程度是否与家庭护理安排中支持服务的使用有关。

材料与方法

对社会协会VdK(德国社会协会)成员进行的一项调查进行定量二次数据分析。统计评估包括描述性分析以及社会经济特征与护理安排特征之间的相关性调查。

结果

在所谓的24小时护理方面,收入与支持服务的使用之间存在相关性,高收入人群中这种情况更为常见。在护理服务和家务帮助服务的使用程度以及家庭环境改造措施方面也可以看到其他收入影响。较高的教育水平与咨询服务使用的增加有关。收入越低,对护理状况的评估越负面。

结论

结果表明护理中存在社会不平等现象,家庭护理的形成选择受社会经济因素影响。该研究还揭示了应对社会不平等方面的挑战,并为进一步研究提供了方向,鉴于当前趋势,这一点变得越来越重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/d921c8f90862/103_2023_3684_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/2633b1f0c7a3/103_2023_3684_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/68645634a276/103_2023_3684_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/d921c8f90862/103_2023_3684_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/2633b1f0c7a3/103_2023_3684_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/68645634a276/103_2023_3684_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6d/10163119/d921c8f90862/103_2023_3684_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Homecare arrangements: examining the use of support services in relation to socioeconomic status].[家庭护理安排:审视与社会经济地位相关的支持服务使用情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):540-549. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03684-6. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
[Social inequality in home care: A scoping review on the impact of socio-economic resources on home care arrangements].家庭护理中的社会不平等:关于社会经济资源对家庭护理安排影响的范围综述
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 May;178:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Attending pediatric acutely ill patients at home: families' socioeconomic characterization, expectations, and experiences.家庭社会经济特征、期望和经验:在家照顾儿科急症患者。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03724-1.
5
[Psychological situation of home care patients in the Federal Republic of Germany].[德意志联邦共和国居家护理患者的心理状况]
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1993 Feb;194(1-2):33-79.
6
Are chronically ill patients high users of homecare services in Canada?加拿大的慢性病患者是否大量使用家庭护理服务?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Oct 1;21(10):e552-9.
7
A Qualitative View of Homecare Support Workers on Unmet Health Needs of People with Dependency.居家护理支持工作者对依赖人群未满足的健康需求的定性观察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 2;17(9):3166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093166.
8
Socioeconomic disparities in home health care service access and utilization: a scoping review.社会经济差异对家庭医疗保健服务的可及性和利用的影响:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Oct;49(10):1310-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
National registry-based data of adverse events in Finnish long-term professional homecare in 2009-2019.2009 - 2019年芬兰长期专业家庭护理中基于全国登记处的不良事件数据。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Feb;32(3-4):548-557. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16312. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
10
Perpetuating harms from isolation among older adults with cognitive impairment: observed discrepancies in homecare service documentation, assessment and approval practices.认知障碍老年人隔离造成的持续伤害:家庭护理服务文件记录、评估和审批实践中观察到的差异
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3616-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic Inequality in the Use of Long-Term Care among European Older Adults: An Empirical Approach Using the SHARE Survey.欧洲老年人长期护理利用中的社会经济不平等:使用 SHARE 调查的实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010020.
2
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.欧洲各地区长期照护系统中家庭护理使用的社会经济不平等。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139.
3
Eligibility or use? Disentangling the sources of horizontal inequity in home care receipt in the Netherlands.
资格还是使用?厘清荷兰家庭护理接受中的水平不公平来源。
Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1161-1179. doi: 10.1002/hec.4126. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Poor, old and in need of care: A qualitative study about the consequences for home care and participation.贫困、年老且需要照料:一项关于居家护理及参与情况后果的定性研究
Ger Med Sci. 2019 Aug 9;17:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/000274. eCollection 2019.
5
Determinants for utilization and transitions of long-term care in adults 65+ in Germany: results from the longitudinal KORA-Age study.德国 65 岁及以上成年人长期护理利用和转变的决定因素:来自 KORA-Age 纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0860-x.
6
[Needs and quality of counseling in long-term care : User perspective on counseling services in Germany].[长期护理中的咨询需求与质量:德国用户对咨询服务的看法]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Aug;51(6):620-627. doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1172-4. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
7
Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans.不平等的不平等:欧洲老年人中正规护理使用的分层
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv038.
8
Inequity in long-term care use and unmet need: two sides of the same coin.长期护理使用方面的不平等与未满足的需求:同一硬币的两面。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
9
Going formal or informal, who cares? The influence of public long-term care insurance.正式与否,谁在乎呢?公共长期护理保险的影响。
Health Econ. 2015 Jun;24(6):631-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.3050. Epub 2014 Apr 8.