Bergler R
Abt. Sozial- und Organisationspsychologie, Universität Bonn.
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1993 Feb;194(1-2):33-79.
The demographic development, advances in medicine and also the increase in AIDS and paraplegia at an early age means that we must assume approximately two million people in Germany requiring care and attention or nursing on a longterm basis. Object of the explorative pilot-study is to analyse the conditions for mental well-being in the case of homecare patients and the influence on behaviour, enjoyment of life and the quality of their hopes for the future. In the study two comparable random surveys have been examined in all their demographic and medical characteristics: (1) homecare patients (n = 60) and (2) patients in old people's or nursing homes (n = 30); in so far as they can be compared, another random survey of younger homecare patients (n = 33) will be taken into consideration in some of the questions. Under examination is the hypothesis that the well-being of people requiring nursing is considerably dependent upon (1) the quality, activity and diversity of their social network (social assistance), (2) the extent of their own competence and deficiences (subjective level of performance), (3) the history of illness and the subjective health status (subjective health status), (4) the way in which they interpret and cope with their own illness (situative positioning), (5) their domestic surroundings, the sociodemographic situation and the subjective creative freedom (ecology), (6) the person's lifestyle and the quality of his prophylactic behaviour (biographical behavioural manner), (7) their ideas, opinions and convictions relating to the alternatives homecare and old people's or nursing home. General findings to be emphasized in the case of homecare patients--compared with patients in old people's or nursing homes--are that: homecare facilitates and/or encourages (1) greater personal freedom, own control over the environment, familiarity, security, variety, challenge, individuality, good care and attention, activation of needs, appetite, future orientation (well-being). (2) a higher level of active social contacts (ringing other people; visiting friends, neighbours, family; writing letters, holidays) and passive social contacts (visits, telephone calls and mail from friends, relatives, etc.) Instead of resignedly conforming to the situation, they are receptive for stimulation, learning, positive interpretation of the situation. (3) more possibilities for social contacts, communication, social stimulation: everyday pleasures are experienced more frequently.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
人口结构的变化、医学的进步以及艾滋病患者和早年截瘫患者数量的增加意味着,我们必须假定德国约有200万人长期需要照料、护理或关怀。探索性试点研究的目的是分析居家护理患者的心理健康状况,以及对其行为、生活乐趣和未来期望质量的影响。在该研究中,对两项具有可比性的随机调查的所有人口统计学和医学特征进行了研究:(1)居家护理患者(n = 60)和(2)养老院或护理院患者(n = 30);在可比较的范围内,在一些问题中将考虑另一项针对年轻居家护理患者的随机调查(n = 33)。正在检验的假设是,需要护理的人的幸福感在很大程度上取决于:(1)其社交网络(社会援助)的质量、活跃度和多样性;(2)自身能力和缺陷的程度(主观表现水平);(3)疾病史和主观健康状况(主观健康状况);(4)他们解释和应对自身疾病的方式(情境定位);(5)他们的家庭环境、社会人口状况和主观创造自由(生态);(6)个人的生活方式及其预防行为的质量(传记行为方式);(7)他们对居家护理和养老院或护理院这两种选择的想法、观点和信念。与养老院或护理院患者相比,居家护理患者的一般研究结果值得强调的是:居家护理促进和/或鼓励(1)更大的个人自由、对环境的自主控制、熟悉感、安全感、多样性、挑战、个性、良好的照料和关怀、需求的激发、食欲、对未来的展望(幸福感)。(2)更高水平的主动社交接触(给他人打电话;拜访朋友、邻居、家人;写信、度假)和被动社交接触(朋友、亲戚等的来访、电话和邮件)。他们不是无奈地顺应现状,而是乐于接受刺激、学习和对现状的积极解读。(3)更多的社交接触、交流和社会刺激机会:更频繁地体验到日常乐趣。(摘要截断于400字)