Suppr超能文献

不平等的不平等:欧洲老年人中正规护理使用的分层

Unequal Inequalities: The Stratification of the Use of Formal Care Among Older Europeans.

作者信息

Albertini Marco, Pavolini Emmanuele

机构信息

Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.

Department of Political Sciences, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Italy.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv038.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The general aim of the article is to incorporate the stratification perspective into the study of (long-term) care systems. In particular, 3 issues are investigated: the extents to which (a) personal and family resources influence the likelihood of using formal care in later life; (b) the unequal access to formal care is mediated by differences in the availability of informal support; (c) the relationship between individuals' resources and the use of formal care in old age varies across care regimes and is related to the institutional design of long-term care policies.

METHOD

Data from Waves 1 and 2 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe for 4 countries: Denmark, Germany, France, and Italy, and population aged at least 65 (N = 9,824) were used. Population-averaged logit models were used.

RESULTS

Logit models revealed that in terms of access to formal care: an individual's educational level plays a limited role; family networks function similarly across the countries studied; in general, financial wealth does not have a significant effect; there is a positive relation between income and the use of formal care in Germany and Italy, and no significant relation in France and Denmark; home ownership has a negative effect in Germany and Denmark. On accounting for informal care, inequality associated with individuals' economic resources remains substantially unaltered.

DISCUSSION

The study shows that care systems based on services provision grant higher access to formal care and create lower inequalities. Moreover, countries where cash-for-care programs and family responsibilities are more important register inequalities in the use of formal care. Access to informal care does not mediate the distribution of formal care.

摘要

目标

本文的总体目标是将分层视角纳入(长期)护理体系的研究。具体而言,研究了三个问题:(a)个人和家庭资源在多大程度上影响晚年使用正规护理的可能性;(b)非正式支持可获得性的差异如何调节正规护理的不平等获取;(c)个体资源与老年正规护理使用之间的关系在不同护理制度下有所不同,且与长期护理政策的制度设计相关。

方法

使用了来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查第1波和第2波的数据,涉及丹麦、德国、法国和意大利4个国家,以及年龄至少为65岁的人口(N = 9824)。采用了总体平均logit模型。

结果

logit模型显示,在获得正规护理方面:个人教育水平作用有限;在所研究的国家中,家庭网络的作用相似;总体而言,金融财富没有显著影响;在德国和意大利,收入与正规护理的使用呈正相关,在法国和丹麦则无显著关系;在德国和丹麦,房屋所有权有负面影响。在考虑非正式护理后,与个人经济资源相关的不平等基本保持不变。

讨论

该研究表明,基于服务提供的护理体系能提供更高的正规护理获取机会,并减少不平等。此外,在护理现金计划和家庭责任更为重要的国家,正规护理使用方面存在不平等。获得非正式护理并不能调节正规护理的分配。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
The Care Gap in Later Life Across European Countries.欧洲各国晚年生活中的照护差距。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Nov 14;78(11):1935-1946. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad118.
6
[Homecare arrangements: examining the use of support services in relation to socioeconomic status].[家庭护理安排:审视与社会经济地位相关的支持服务使用情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):540-549. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03684-6. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and morbidity trends: is there compression of morbidity?死亡率和发病率趋势:是否存在发病减少?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jan;66(1):75-86. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq088. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验