Suppr超能文献

慢性腰痛退伍军人的初始治疗方法和医疗保健利用:倾向评分分析。

Initial treatment approaches and healthcare utilization among veterans with low back pain: a propensity score analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA, 02129-4557, USA.

Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 21;23(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09207-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid prescriptions for Veterans with low back pain (LBP) persist despite the availability of PT, a lower medical risk treatment option. Patterns of treatment and subsequent healthcare utilization for Veterans with LBP are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of physical therapy (PT) and opioids and outcomes of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use for Veterans with incident LBP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study identifying Veterans with a new diagnosis of LBP using ICD codes from the Veterans Administration national database from 2012 to 2017. Veterans were classified into three treatment groups based on the first treatment received within 30 days of incident LBP: receipt of PT, opioids, or neither PT nor opioids. Outcomes, events of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use, were identified beginning on day 31 up to one year following initial treatment. We used propensity score matching to account for the potential selection bias in evaluating the associations between initial treatment and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 373,717 incident cases of LBP between 2012 and 2017. Of those 28,850 (7.7%) received PT, 48,978 (13.1%) received opioids, and 295,889 (79.2%) received neither PT or opioids. Pain, marital status and the presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic chronic conditions had the strongest statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Veterans receiving opioids compared to no treatment had higher odds of having a spinal surgery (2.04, 99% CI: 1.67, 2.49) and progressing to chronic opioid use (11.8, 99% CI: 11.3, 12.3). Compared to Veterans receiving PT those receiving opioids had higher odds (1.69, 99% CI: 1.21, 2.37) of having spinal surgery and progressing to chronic opioid use (17.8, 99% CI: 16.0, 19.9).

CONCLUSION

Initiating treatment with opioids compared to PT was associated with higher odds of spinal surgery and chronic opioid use for Veterans with incident LBP. More Veterans received opioids compared to PT as an initial treatment for incident LBP. Our findings can inform rehabilitation care practices for Veterans with incident LBP.

摘要

背景

尽管物理治疗(PT)是一种医疗风险较低的治疗选择,但退伍军人的腰痛(LBP)仍持续开处阿片类药物处方。患有 LBP 的退伍军人的治疗模式和随后的医疗保健利用情况尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估物理治疗(PT)和阿片类药物与退伍军人新发 LBP 的脊柱手术和慢性阿片类药物使用结果之间的关联。

方法

我们使用退伍军人事务部国家数据库中的 ICD 代码,对 2012 年至 2017 年期间新发 LBP 的退伍军人进行了回顾性队列研究。根据新发 LBP 后 30 天内接受的第一种治疗方法,将退伍军人分为三组:接受 PT、阿片类药物或两者均未接受治疗。从第 31 天开始至初始治疗后一年,确定手术和慢性阿片类药物使用的结果事件。我们使用倾向评分匹配来纠正评估初始治疗与结果之间关系时的潜在选择偏差。

结果

2012 年至 2017 年期间,新发 LBP 病例 373717 例。其中 28850 例(7.7%)接受 PT,48978 例(13.1%)接受阿片类药物治疗,295889 例(79.2%)既未接受 PT 也未接受阿片类药物治疗。疼痛、婚姻状况以及心血管、肺部或代谢性慢性疾病的存在在治疗组之间具有最强的统计学显著差异。与未接受治疗的退伍军人相比,接受阿片类药物治疗的退伍军人进行脊柱手术的可能性更高(2.04,99%CI:1.67,2.49),并且进展为慢性阿片类药物使用者的可能性更高(11.8,99%CI:11.3,12.3)。与接受 PT 的退伍军人相比,接受阿片类药物治疗的退伍军人进行脊柱手术的可能性更高(1.69,99%CI:1.21,2.37),进展为慢性阿片类药物使用者的可能性更高(17.8,99%CI:16.0,19.9)。

结论

与 PT 相比,起始阿片类药物治疗与退伍军人新发 LBP 的脊柱手术和慢性阿片类药物使用的可能性增加有关。与 PT 相比,更多的退伍军人接受阿片类药物作为新发 LBP 的初始治疗。我们的研究结果可为新发 LBP 的退伍军人提供康复护理实践信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ca/10029316/d45e5dd4e401/12913_2023_9207_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验