Institute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 22;49(Suppl_2):S93-S103. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac145.
Quantitative acoustic and textual measures derived from speech ("speech features") may provide valuable biomarkers for psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). We sought to identify cross-diagnostic latent factors for speech disturbance with relevance for SSD and computational modeling.
Clinical ratings for speech disturbance were generated across 14 items for a cross-diagnostic sample (N = 334), including SSD (n = 90). Speech features were quantified using an automated pipeline for brief recorded samples of free speech. Factor models for the clinical ratings were generated using exploratory factor analysis, then tested with confirmatory factor analysis in the cross-diagnostic and SSD groups. The relationships between factor scores and computational speech features were examined for 202 of the participants.
We found a 3-factor model with a good fit in the cross-diagnostic group and an acceptable fit for the SSD subsample. The model identifies an impaired expressivity factor and 2 interrelated disorganized factors for inefficient and incoherent speech. Incoherent speech was specific to psychosis groups, while inefficient speech and impaired expressivity showed intermediate effects in people with nonpsychotic disorders. Each of the 3 factors had significant and distinct relationships with speech features, which differed for the cross-diagnostic vs SSD groups.
We report a cross-diagnostic 3-factor model for speech disturbance which is supported by good statistical measures, intuitive, applicable to SSD, and relatable to linguistic theories. It provides a valuable framework for understanding speech disturbance and appropriate targets for modeling with quantitative speech features.
从言语中提取的定量声学和文本测量值(“言语特征”)可能为精神障碍,特别是精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)提供有价值的生物标志物。我们试图确定与 SSD 和计算模型相关的言语障碍的跨诊断潜在因素。
针对言语障碍的临床评分是通过对跨诊断样本(N=334)的 14 项指标生成的,包括 SSD(n=90)。使用自动管道对简短的自由言语记录样本进行了言语特征的量化。使用探索性因素分析生成了临床评分的因素模型,然后在跨诊断和 SSD 组中使用验证性因素分析进行了测试。对 202 名参与者的因子评分与计算言语特征之间的关系进行了检查。
我们在跨诊断组中发现了一个具有良好拟合度的 3 因素模型,在 SSD 子样本中具有可接受的拟合度。该模型确定了一个表达受损因子和两个相互关联的紊乱因子,用于低效和不连贯的言语。不连贯的言语是精神病组特有的,而低效的言语和表达受损则在非精神病患者中表现出中间效应。这 3 个因素中的每一个都与言语特征有显著而独特的关系,这在跨诊断组和 SSD 组之间有所不同。
我们报告了一个跨诊断的 3 因素模型,用于言语障碍,该模型得到了良好的统计测量支持,具有直观性、适用于 SSD,并与语言理论相关。它为理解言语障碍提供了一个有价值的框架,为使用定量言语特征进行建模提供了适当的目标。