• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适者生存的大流行时代:引入疾病相关的社会达尔文主义。

Survival of the fittest in the pandemic age: Introducing disease-related social Darwinism.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281072. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0281072
PMID:36947535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10032491/
Abstract

COVID-19 was a harsh reminder that diseases are an aspect of human existence and mortality. It was also a live experiment in the formation and alteration of disease-related attitudes. Not only are these attitudes relevant to an individual's self-protective behavior, but they also seem to be associated with social and political attitudes more broadly. One of these attitudes is Social Darwinism, which holds that a pandemic benefits society by enabling nature "to weed out the weak". In two countries (N = 300, N = 533), we introduce and provide evidence for the reliability, validity, and usefulness of the Disease-Related Social Darwinism (DRSD) Short Scale measuring this concept. Results indicate that DRSD is meaningful related to other central political attitudes like Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism and neoliberalism. Importantly, the scale significantly predicted people's protective behavior during the Pandemic over and above general social Darwinism. Moreover, it significantly predicted conservative attitudes, even after controlling for Social Dominance Orientation.

摘要

新冠疫情严峻地提醒人们,疾病是人类生存和死亡的一部分。它也是一个关于形成和改变与疾病相关的态度的现场实验。这些态度不仅与个人的自我保护行为有关,而且似乎与更广泛的社会和政治态度有关。其中一种态度是社会达尔文主义,它认为大流行通过使自然“淘汰弱者”而使社会受益。在两个国家(N = 300,N = 533)中,我们引入并提供了疾病相关社会达尔文主义(DRSD)短量表测量这一概念的可靠性、有效性和有用性的证据。结果表明,DRSD与其他核心政治态度(如社会支配倾向、威权主义和新自由主义)有意义地相关。重要的是,该量表在大流行期间显著预测了人们的保护行为,甚至超过了一般的社会达尔文主义。此外,即使在控制了社会支配倾向之后,它也显著预测了保守态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/10032491/967b4a549668/pone.0281072.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/10032491/73feeb23e138/pone.0281072.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/10032491/967b4a549668/pone.0281072.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/10032491/73feeb23e138/pone.0281072.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e38/10032491/967b4a549668/pone.0281072.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival of the fittest in the pandemic age: Introducing disease-related social Darwinism.适者生存的大流行时代:引入疾病相关的社会达尔文主义。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281072. eCollection 2023.
2
Give me liberty or give me COVID-19: How social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and libertarianism explain Americans' reactions to COVID-19.不自由,毋宁死于新冠:社会支配取向、右翼威权主义和自由主义如何解释美国人对新冠疫情的反应。
Risk Anal. 2022 Dec;42(12):2691-2703. doi: 10.1111/risa.13885. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Attitudes towards favoring the fall of Tall Poppies: The role of Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, Political Ideologies, and Self-Esteem.对打倒“高草”(优秀杰出的人)的态度:社会支配倾向、威权主义、政治意识形态和自尊的作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep 3;162(5):640-653. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1944034. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
4
How a terror attack affects right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and their relationship to torture attitudes.恐怖袭击如何影响右翼威权主义、社会支配取向及其与酷刑态度的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Oct;59(5):547-552. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12463. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Attitude toward death, not religious commitment mediates the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward life extension.对死亡的态度,而非宗教信仰,在政治意识形态与对延长寿命的态度之间起中介作用。
Death Stud. 2022;46(10):2376-2383. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2021.1944402. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
The balanced ideological antipathy model: explaining the effects of ideological attitudes on inter-group antipathy across the political spectrum.平衡的意识形态反感模型:解释意识形态态度对整个政治光谱上群体间反感的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Dec;41(12):1607-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167215603713. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time.社会支配倾向概念的不同含义:预测政治态度随时间的变化。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;49(Pt 2):385-404. doi: 10.1348/014466609X435723. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
8
Social dominance orientation: revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes.社会支配倾向:重新审视预测社会和政治态度的变量的结构和功能。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):583-606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
9
The gender gap: differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation.性别差距:政治态度与社会支配取向的差异
Br J Soc Psychol. 1997 Mar;36 ( Pt 1):49-68. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x.
10
Psychological variables underlying political orientations in an old and a new democracy: A comparative study between Sweden and Latvia.一个老牌民主国家和一个新兴民主国家政治倾向背后的心理变量:瑞典与拉脱维亚的比较研究
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Oct;57(5):437-45. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12314. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health system resilience and pandemic response: a comparative analysis of China, Singapore, the U.S., and the U.K.卫生系统韧性与大流行应对:中国、新加坡、美国和英国的比较分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;13:1666323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1666323. eCollection 2025.
2
Terminology in ecology and evolutionary biology disproportionately harms marginalized groups.生态学和进化生物学中的术语对边缘化群体造成了不成比例的伤害。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):e3002933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002933. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Spatio-Temporal Patterns of the SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Who are the 'social Darwinists'? On dispositional determinants of perceiving the social world as competitive jungle.“社会达尔文主义者”是谁?论感知竞争丛林般的社会世界的倾向性决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0254434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254434. eCollection 2021.
2
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic.
德国新冠病毒疫情的时空模式
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;25(8):1137. doi: 10.3390/e25081137.
两极分化与公共卫生:新冠疫情期间社会 distancing 方面的党派差异。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但原文中该词似乎有误,可能是“social distancing measures”之类表述会更准确,直接翻译的话就是“社会距离” )
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
Why deforestation and extinctions make pandemics more likely.为什么森林砍伐和物种灭绝会增加大流行病发生的可能性。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):175-176. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02341-1.
5
Justifying Social Inequalities: The Role of Social Darwinism.为社会不平等辩护:社会达尔文主义的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jul;46(7):1139-1155. doi: 10.1177/0146167219896924. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Vaccine Hesitancy.疫苗犹豫
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Nov;90(11):1562-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.09.006.
7
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
8
Vaccine hesitancy: an overview.疫苗犹豫:概述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1763-73. doi: 10.4161/hv.24657. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
9
Global trends in emerging infectious diseases.新发传染病的全球趋势。
Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):990-3. doi: 10.1038/nature06536.
10
In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition.我们信赖基因:心理本质主义的生物学成分及其与动机性社会认知机制的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Apr;88(4):686-702. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686.