Müller Moritz, Schmucker Christine, Naumann Johannes, Schlueter Nadine, Huber Roman, Lederer Ann-Kathrin
Center for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2023 Dec;59:114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Acute dental pain is a common issue leading to dental consultation. Besides causal therapy, patients are treated with acupuncture, but efficacy in acute dental pain is still not clarified. We aimed to evaluate results of recent research to estimate the efficacy of acupuncture compared to pain-relieving approaches in treatment of acute dental pain. A systematic review of controlled trials being published between database inception and 2020 were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture (alone or as complementary therapy) compared to local anesthesia or conventional analgesic medications in acute dental pain (intraoperatively and postoperatively) and to clarify whether acupuncture reduces the use of postoperative analgesic medications. Of 1672 publications, 23 publications met the inclusion criteria. From these, 11 randomized controlled trials (n = 668) reported on the efficacy of acupuncture on postoperative acute dental pain. Patients, who received acupuncture, showed lower pain scores postoperatively compared to sham acupuncture (Relative Risk -0.77, 95% Confidence interval -1.52 to -0.03). Overall, the results suggest a potential role of acupuncture in improving acute dental pain intraoperatively and postoperatively as well as improving the efficacy of local anesthesia, but the results are limited due to methodological shortcomings emphasizing the necessity for future high-quality research.
急性牙痛是导致患者寻求牙科诊疗的常见问题。除了病因治疗外,患者还接受针刺治疗,但针刺治疗急性牙痛的疗效仍不明确。我们旨在评估近期研究结果,以估计针刺疗法与缓解疼痛方法相比,在治疗急性牙痛方面的疗效。我们对数据库建立至2020年间发表的对照试验进行了系统评价,以评估针刺疗法(单独使用或作为辅助疗法)与局部麻醉或传统镇痛药物相比,在急性牙痛(术中及术后)治疗中的疗效,并明确针刺疗法是否能减少术后镇痛药物的使用。在1672篇出版物中,有23篇符合纳入标准。其中,11项随机对照试验(n = 668)报告了针刺疗法对术后急性牙痛的疗效。与假针刺相比,接受针刺治疗的患者术后疼痛评分更低(相对危险度 -0.77,95%置信区间 -1.52至 -0.03)。总体而言,结果表明针刺疗法在改善术中及术后急性牙痛以及提高局部麻醉效果方面可能具有一定作用,但由于方法学上的缺陷,结果有限,这凸显了未来开展高质量研究的必要性。