• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动健康技术与赋权。

Mobile health technology and empowerment.

机构信息

Department of Medical History and Bioethics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2024 Jul;38(6):481-490. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13157. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13157
PMID:36950727
Abstract

Mobile Health (m-health) technologies, such as wearables, apps, and smartwatches, are increasingly viewed as tools for improving health and well-being. In particular, such technologies are conceptualized as means for laypersons to master their own health, by becoming "engaged" and "empowered" "managers" of their bodies and minds. One notion that is especially prevalent in the discussions around m-health technology is that of empowerment. In this paper, I analyze the notion of empowerment at play in the m-health arena, identifying five elements that are required for empowerment. These are (1) knowledge, (2) control, (3) responsibility, (4) the availability of good choices, and (5) healthy desires. I argue that at least sometimes, these features are not present in the use of these technologies. I then argue that instead of empowerment, it is plausible that m-health technology merely facilitates a feeling of empowerment. I suggest this may be problematic, as it risks placing the burden of health and behavior change solely on the shoulders of individuals who may not be in a position to affect such change.

摘要

移动健康(m-health)技术,如可穿戴设备、应用程序和智能手表,越来越被视为改善健康和幸福感的工具。特别是,这些技术被认为是让普通人通过成为自己身体和思维的“参与”和“授权”“管理者”来掌握自己健康的手段。在围绕移动健康技术的讨论中,一个特别流行的概念是赋权。在本文中,我分析了 m-health 领域中赋权概念,确定了赋权所需的五个要素。这些要素包括:(1)知识;(2)控制;(3)责任;(4)良好选择的可用性;(5)健康的欲望。我认为,至少在某些情况下,这些特征在这些技术的使用中并不存在。然后,我认为,移动健康技术不仅赋予了赋权感,而且很可能只是赋予了赋权感。我认为这可能是有问题的,因为它有可能将健康和行为改变的责任完全放在可能无法影响这种改变的个人身上。

相似文献

1
Mobile health technology and empowerment.移动健康技术与赋权。
Bioethics. 2024 Jul;38(6):481-490. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13157. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
4
On misempowerment & mobile health.论权力剥夺与移动健康
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):549-560. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10277-4. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
5
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
6
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
7
Patient Restraint and Seclusion患者约束与隔离
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores.移动医疗策略与 HIV 暴露后预防知识和获取相关:系统文献综述、专利数据库技术展望以及应用商店系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):e23912. doi: 10.2196/23912.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in Medical AI: The Case of mHealth Diabetes Apps.对医疗人工智能的信任:移动健康糖尿病应用程序的案例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70216. doi: 10.1111/jep.70216.
2
Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.用于预防阿尔茨海默病的移动健康应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9. Epub 2025 May 26.
3
What Clinicians Should Tell Patients About Wearable Devices and Data Privacy: A Narrative Review.临床医生应告知患者关于可穿戴设备和数据隐私的内容:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 25;17(3):e81167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81167. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.数字健康技术对道德责任的影响:一项范围综述
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
5
Acceptability Criteria of Precision Medicine: Lessons From Patients' Experiences With the GUIDE-IBD Trial Regarding the Use of Mobile Health Technology.精准医学的可接受性标准:从患者参与GUIDE-IBD试验使用移动健康技术的经验中汲取的教训。
Crohns Colitis 360. 2023 Nov 8;5(4):otad068. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otad068. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
A new technology for pacifier weaning: a thematic analysis.一种用于安抚奶嘴戒断的新技术:一项主题分析。
Front Pediatr. 2023 May 24;11:1161886. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1161886. eCollection 2023.