Olson Mary M, Alhelou Nay, Kavattur Purvaja S, Rountree Lillian, Winkler Inga T
Institute for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;2(7):e0000070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000070. eCollection 2022.
Menstruation is shrouded in stigma and shame-that is the common refrain in burgeoning initiatives on menstrual health and hygiene. Public policies alone cannot undo stigma and enact social change, but they do interact with social norms. They can reflect and adopt stigmatizing attitudes and, as a result, institutionalize, formalize, and legitimize stigma; or they can actively challenge and denounce it and mitigate existing discrimination. Against this background, we explored whether and how policies on menstrual health and hygiene address menstrual stigma and advance menstrual literacy based on an analysis of 34 policy documents and 85 in-depth interviews with policy-makers and advocates in four countries: India, Kenya, Senegal, and the United States. We found that policies recognized menstrual stigma and set out to break the silence surrounding menstruation and advance menstrual education, but they did not contribute to dismantling menstrual stigma. Policy-makers seemed constrained by the very stigma they sought to tackle, resulting in hesitancy and missed opportunities. Policies raised awareness of menstruation, often with great noise, but they simultaneously called for hiding and concealing any actual, visible signs of menstruation and its embodied messiness. Educational initiatives mostly promoted bodily management and control, rather than agency and autonomy. As a result, policies might have succeeded in breaking the silence around menstruation, but stigma cannot be broken as easily. We first need to recognize its (invisible) power and its impacts in all spheres of life in order to actively challenge, dismantle, and redefine it.
月经笼罩在污名和羞耻之中——这是新兴的月经健康与卫生倡议中常见的说法。仅靠公共政策无法消除污名并实现社会变革,但它们确实会与社会规范相互作用。它们可能反映并接纳污名化态度,结果使污名制度化、形式化并合法化;或者它们可以积极挑战和谴责污名,并减轻现有的歧视。在此背景下,我们基于对四个国家(印度、肯尼亚、塞内加尔和美国)的34份政策文件以及对政策制定者和倡导者的85次深入访谈的分析,探讨了月经健康与卫生政策是否以及如何应对月经污名并提高月经知识素养。我们发现,政策认识到月经污名,并着手打破围绕月经的沉默并推进月经教育,但它们并未有助于消除月经污名。政策制定者似乎受到他们试图解决的污名的限制,导致犹豫不决和错失机会。政策提高了对月经的认识,往往声势浩大,但同时又要求隐藏和掩盖月经的任何实际可见迹象及其带来的凌乱。教育倡议大多促进身体管理和控制,而非能动性和自主性。结果,政策可能成功打破了围绕月经的沉默,但污名却不那么容易消除。我们首先需要认识到它(无形的)力量及其在生活各个领域的影响,以便积极挑战、消除并重新定义它。