• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving accessibility of scientific research by artificial intelligence-An example for lay abstract generation.通过人工智能提高科研的可及性——以生成非专业摘要为例。
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 29;9:20552076231186245. doi: 10.1177/20552076231186245. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency.利用人工智能将摘要用通俗易懂的语言进行总结,以提高研究的可及性和透明度。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae186.
3
Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.人机之争:在妇科和泌尿外科学中识别 ChatGPT 生成的摘要。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):276.e1-276.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
"Is all the stuff about neurons necessary?" The development of lay summaries to disseminate findings from the Newcastle Cognitive Function after Stroke (COGFAST) study.“所有关于神经元的内容都有必要吗?” 中风后纽卡斯尔认知功能(COGFAST)研究结果传播的通俗总结的发展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 11;3:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0066-y. eCollection 2017.
5
Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT 生成的和人工撰写的基础研究摘要在质量、正确性和相似性方面的比较:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e51229. doi: 10.2196/51229.
6
Easily readable? Examining the readability of lay summaries published in Autism Research.易于阅读?审视发表于《自闭症研究》的外行摘要的可读性。
Autism Res. 2023 May;16(5):935-940. doi: 10.1002/aur.2917. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.人工智能可以生成虚假但看起来真实的科学医学文章:潘多拉的盒子已经被打开。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 31;25:e46924. doi: 10.2196/46924.
8
identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review.确定科学同行评审中的性别差距。
Elife. 2023 Nov 3;12:RP90230. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90230.
9
What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.在《矫形外科与创伤学:手术与研究》杂志上发表的人工智能文本在一年时间内的生成率是多少?分析 2022 年 11 月 ChatGPT 发布前后的 425 篇文章。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103694. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103694. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
10
Human versus artificial intelligence-generated arthroplasty literature: A single-blinded analysis of perceived communication, quality, and authorship source.人工与人工智能生成的关节置换文献:感知交流、质量和作者来源的单盲分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2024 Feb;20(1):e2621. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2621.

引用本文的文献

1
Using artificial intelligence to expedite and enhance plain language summary abstract writing of scientific content.利用人工智能加快并提升科学内容的通俗易懂的摘要撰写。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Apr 3;8(2):ooaf023. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf023. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities.生成式人工智能时代的开放科学:挑战与机遇的探索性分析。
Quant Sci Stud. 2025;6:22-45. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00337. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency.利用人工智能将摘要用通俗易懂的语言进行总结,以提高研究的可及性和透明度。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae186.
4
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.开发和传播医学研究信息的简明语言资源报告的实践和障碍:范围综述。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports.ChatGPT 让医学文献通俗易懂:简化放射学报告的探索性案例研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2817-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Effect of Treadmill Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Fall Rates in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于跑步机扰动的平衡训练对社区居住的老年人跌倒率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238422. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8422.
3
Can the ChatGPT and other large language models with internet-connected database solve the questions and concerns of patient with prostate cancer and help democratize medical knowledge?ChatGPT和其他连接互联网数据库的大型语言模型能否解决前列腺癌患者的问题和担忧,并有助于普及医学知识?
J Transl Med. 2023 Apr 19;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04123-5.
4
Are lay abstracts published in readable enough for the general public? A short report.发表的非专业摘要对普通大众来说可读性够强吗?一篇简短报告。
Autism. 2023 Nov;27(8):2555-2559. doi: 10.1177/13623613231163083. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
5
Bimekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic treatment: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (BE OPTIMAL).在未接受过生物治疗的银屑病关节炎患者中使用比美吉珠单抗:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期试验(BE OPTIMAL)。
Lancet. 2023 Jan 7;401(10370):25-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02302-9. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
6
Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.部分口服与静脉抗生素治疗心内膜炎。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
The history of open access medical publishing: a comprehensive review.开放获取医学出版的历史:全面综述
Dermatol Online J. 2016 Sep 15;22(9):13030/qt6578w9f8.
8
Opinion: Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication.观点:需要通俗易懂的总结来加强科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3585-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500882112.
9
Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists.非专业摘要与总结:给科学家的写作建议。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):577-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0570-1.

通过人工智能提高科研的可及性——以生成非专业摘要为例。

Improving accessibility of scientific research by artificial intelligence-An example for lay abstract generation.

作者信息

Schmitz Boris

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

DRV Clinic Königsfeld, Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Ennepetal, Germany.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2023 Jun 29;9:20552076231186245. doi: 10.1177/20552076231186245. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076231186245
PMID:37426587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10328007/
Abstract

The role of scientific research in modern society is essential for driving innovation, informing policy decisions, and shaping public opinion. However, communicating scientific findings to the general public can be challenging due to the technical and complex nature of scientific research. Lay abstracts are written summaries of scientific research that are designed to be easily understandable and provide a concise and clear overview of key findings and implications. Artificial intelligence language models have the potential to generate lay abstracts that are consistent and accurate while reducing the potential for misinterpretation or bias. This study presents examples of artificial intelligence-generated lay abstracts of recently published articles, which were produced using different currently available artificial intelligence tools. The generated abstracts were of high linguistic quality and accurately represented the findings of the original articles. Adopting lay summaries can increase the visibility, impact, and transparency of scientific research, and enhance scientists' reputation among peers, while currently, available artificial intelligence models offer solutions to produce lay abstracts. However, the coherence and accuracy of artificial intelligence language models must be validated before they can be used for this purpose without restrictions.

摘要

科学研究在现代社会中的作用对于推动创新、为政策决策提供信息以及塑造公众舆论至关重要。然而,由于科学研究具有技术性和复杂性,向公众传达科学发现可能具有挑战性。非专业摘要(Lay abstracts)是科学研究的书面总结,旨在易于理解,并对关键发现和影响提供简洁明了的概述。人工智能语言模型有潜力生成一致且准确的非专业摘要,同时减少误解或偏差的可能性。本研究展示了使用不同现有人工智能工具为最近发表的文章生成的人工智能非专业摘要示例。生成的摘要具有较高的语言质量,准确地呈现了原始文章的研究结果。采用非专业摘要可以提高科学研究的知名度、影响力和透明度,并提升科学家在同行中的声誉,而目前可用的人工智能模型为生成非专业摘要提供了解决方案。然而,在无限制地用于此目的之前,必须验证人工智能语言模型的连贯性和准确性。